DialinkApplication · Deltaww

CVE-2022-2969

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-12-01
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.5.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Delta Industrial Automation DIALink versions prior to v1.5.0.0 Beta 4 uses an external input to construct a pathname intended to identify a file or directory located underneath a restricted parent directory. However, the software does not properly neutralize special elements within the pathname, which can cause the pathname to resolve to a location outside of the restricted directory.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Delta Industrial Automation DIALink versions before v1.5.0.0 Beta 4 contains a path traversal vulnerability where external input is used to construct file paths without proper sanitization of special elements like '../', allowing attackers to access files outside the restricted directory.

MitigationUpgrade DIALink to v1.5.0.0 Beta 4 or later. Implement proper path validation ensuring the constructed path remains within the intended directory boundaries, rejecting any input containing traversal sequences.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DialinkApplication
Affected:< 1.5.0.0= 1.5.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify DIALink installation and version
    Locate the DIALink application on the system and determine its installed version number (check application properties, About dialog, installed programs listing, or version file within the installation directory)
    Affected if The installed version is any release before v1.5.0.0 Beta 4, or is exactly version 1.5.0.0 (the vulnerable versions)
  2. Confirm the application uses external input for file paths
    Examine DIALink configuration, logs, or documentation to determine if the application accepts external input (user-provided paths, network requests, configuration parameters) to construct file paths for operations
    Affected if The application processes external input to build file paths without documented sanitization of path traversal sequences like '../'
  3. Check for path traversal protection
    Review application security settings, logs, or available documentation for any path validation mechanisms that prevent directory traversal
    Affected if No path traversal protection (such as validation against '../' sequences or directory boundary checks) is configured or present

The environment is affected if DIALink version is below v1.5.0.0 Beta 4 (or equals 1.5.0.0) AND the application processes external input to construct file paths without proper path traversal validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.5.0.0 or later
Fixed in 1.5.0.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade DIALink to v1.5.0.0 Beta 4 or later. Implement proper path validation ensuring the constructed path remains within the intended directory boundaries, rejecting any input containing traversal sequences.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

v1.5.0.0 Beta 4

  1. Obtain Delta Industrial Automation DIALink version 1.5.0.0 Beta 4 or later from the official vendor source
  2. Back up existing DIALink configurations and data before upgrading
  3. Uninstall the current affected version (versions < 1.5.0.0 or = 1.5.0.0)
  4. Install version 1.5.0.0 Beta 4 or later
  5. Verify the installation was successful and confirm the path traversal vulnerability is resolved

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Dialink Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-2969 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-2969 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data