CVE-2022-29826
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCleartext Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric GX Works3 versions from 1.000A to 1.087R and Motion Control Setting(GX Works3 related software) versions from 1.000A to 1.042U allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to disclose sensitive information. As a result, unauthenticated users may view programs and project files or execute programs illegally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCleartext Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric GX Works3 and Motion Control Setting software allows remote unauthenticated attackers to view programs, project files, and potentially execute programs illegally due to unencrypted storage of sensitive data.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.000a, <= 1.011m>= 1.015r, <= 1.086qCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed GX Works3 versionOpen GX Works3 and navigate to Help > Product Information, or check Programs and Features (Windows) for the installed version.Affected if The installed version falls within 1.000a through 1.011m, or 1.015r through 1.086q.
-
Locate GX Works3 project filesSearch for project file extensions used by GX Works3 (typically .gx3, .gwx, or folder structures containing .mtw files) in the system.Affected if Project files exist and are stored in unencrypted locations accessible to unauthorized users.
-
Verify project file storage securityInspect the directory permissions on project file folders. Check if files are stored on network shares, unencrypted drives, or locations with broad access permissions.Affected if Project files are stored without encryption and with weak or shared access controls.
-
Check for sensitive data in project filesOpen a sample project file with a text editor or hex viewer to confirm whether sensitive information (IP addresses, credentials, proprietary logic) appears in cleartext within the file content.Affected if Sensitive data within project files is stored in cleartext rather than encrypted format.
A defender is affected if GX Works3 version is within the ranges 1.000a-1.011m or 1.015r-1.086q AND project files containing sensitive data are stored in unencrypted form with insufficient access controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement network segmentation and access controls to limit exposure; contact Mitsubishi Electric for patched versions; review and encrypt sensitive project files at rest where possible.
GX Works3 version 1.087S or later (or the latest stable release available from Mitsubishi Electric)
- 1. Identify the currently installed GX Works3 version by opening the software and checking 'Help' > 'Product Information' or the program's version properties
- 2. Download the fixed version of GX Works3 from the official Mitsubishi Electric download page: https://www.mitsubishielectric.com/fa/download/
- 3. Verify the downloaded installer matches the official file hashes provided on the download page
- 4. Create a complete backup of all existing GX Works3 project files, programs, and settings before proceeding with the upgrade
- 5. Close all running instances of GX Works3 and any related Mitsubishi Electric software
- 6. Run the installer with administrator privileges and follow the on-screen installation wizard prompts
- 7. After installation completes, verify the new version is 1.087S or higher by checking 'Help' > 'Product Information'
- 8. Test that existing project files can be opened and that project data is no longer stored in cleartext format
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29826 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29826 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data