MdaemonApplication · Altn

CVE-2022-29975

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-05-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 22.0.0 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Authenticated Reflected Cross-site scripting at CC Parameter was discovered in MDaemon before 22.0.0 .

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Authenticated reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in MDaemon email server before version 22.0.0. The CC parameter in the web interface does not properly sanitize user input, allowing an authenticated attacker to inject malicious JavaScript that gets reflected back in the HTTP response.

MitigationUpgrade to MDaemon version 22.0.0 or later which contains the security patch for this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MdaemonApplication
Affected:< 22.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm MDaemon is installed
    Check for the MDaemon service in Windows Services (services.msc) or look for the installation directory typically at C:\MDaemon or C:\Program Files\MDaemon
    Affected if MDaemon service or installation directory exists on the system
  2. Determine installed MDaemon version
    Open MDaemon's About dialog from the system tray icon, or check the version.txt file in the MDaemon installation directory, or run: reg query 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Alt-N Technologies\MDaemon' /v Version
    Affected if The displayed version number is lower than 22.0.0 (for example, 21.x.x or earlier)
  3. Check if WebMail or WorldClient is enabled
    Open MDaemon GUI, go to Setup > Web Services / WebMail, or inspect the MDaemon.ini configuration file for entries under [WebMail] or [WorldClient] sections
    Affected if WebMail or WorldClient web interface is enabled and accessible over HTTP/HTTPS
  4. Verify the CC parameter is in use
    The vulnerability affects the CC parameter in the webmail interface. Check if the webmail component accepts email input with CC fields. This is typically available when composing emails through the web interface at /WorldClient or /WebMail endpoints
    Affected if The web interface is active and users can compose emails with CC fields through the browser

You are affected if MDaemon version is below 22.0.0 AND the WorldClient/WebMail web interface is enabled and accessible, allowing authenticated users to compose emails with CC fields.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 22.0.0 or later
Fixed in 22.0.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to MDaemon version 22.0.0 or later which contains the security patch for this vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

MDaemon 22.0.0 or later

  1. Download MDaemon version 22.0.0 or later from the official MDaemon website or your licensed download location
  2. Backup your current MDaemon configuration and data
  3. Stop the MDaemon service before upgrading
  4. Install the new version following the standard upgrade procedure
  5. Restart the MDaemon service after installation
  6. Verify the webmail interface is functioning correctly and the CC parameter is no longer vulnerable to XSS
Caveat Review MDaemon 22.0.0 release notes for any configuration or feature changes that may affect your deployment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Mdaemon Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-29975 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-29975 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data