CVE-2022-3001
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThis vulnerability exists in Milesight Video Management Systems (VMS), all firmware versions prior to 40.7.0.79-r1, due to improper input handling at camera’s web-based management interface. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted http request on the targeted network camera. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to cause a Denial of Service condition on the targeted device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMilesight VMS cameras running firmware versions prior to 40.7.0.79-r1 contain an improper input handling vulnerability in their web-based management interface. A remote attacker can send a specially crafted HTTP request to trigger the flaw, causing a Denial of Service condition on the targeted camera device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 40.7.0.79= 40.7.0.79CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device as a Milesight VMS cameraLocate the physical camera or access your network device inventory to confirm the device model is a Milesight camera product. Check the device label, packaging, or network scan results for the Milesight manufacturer.Affected if The device is not a Milesight VMS camera product, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Access the web-based management interfaceOpen a web browser and navigate to the camera's IP address. Log in with administrator credentials to access the management dashboard.Affected if The web management interface is not accessible or not configured, then the attack surface for this vulnerability may be limited.
-
Locate the firmware version informationIn the web interface, navigate to System or Maintenance settings (often under System > Maintenance > Version or Device Info). Record the displayed firmware version number.Affected if The firmware version cannot be retrieved from the web interface, check the physical device label or use the Milesight discovery tool / ONVIF to query the firmware version.
-
Compare firmware version against affected rangeCompare the installed firmware version to the affected versions: any version less than 40.7.0.79, or exactly version 40.7.0.79. The fixed version is 40.7.0.79-r1 or later.Affected if Installed firmware version is < 40.7.0.79 OR installed version equals exactly 40.7.0.79, then the device is affected by this vulnerability.
If the Milesight VMS camera runs firmware version 40.7.0.79 or any earlier version (but not 40.7.0.79-r1 or later), and the web-based management interface is network-accessible, the environment is affected by CVE-2022-3001.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped40.7.0.79
Update Milesight camera firmware to version 40.7.0.79-r1 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict network access to the camera management interfaces using firewall rules or VLAN segmentation.
40.7.0.79-r1
- Check current firmware version of the Milesight VMS/network camera device
- Download firmware version 40.7.0.79-r1 (or later) from the official Milesight support website or portal
- Access the camera's web-based management interface
- Navigate to the firmware upgrade section (typically under System > Maintenance or similar)
- Upload and apply the downloaded firmware file
- Wait for the upgrade process to complete and the device to reboot
- Verify the new firmware version is 40.7.0.79-r1 or higher
- Confirm the device is functioning normally and the web interface is accessible
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-3001 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-3001 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data