CVE-2022-30262
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Emerson ControlWave 'Next Generation' RTUs through 2022-05-02 mishandle firmware integrity. They utilize the BSAP-IP protocol to transmit firmware updates. Firmware updates are supplied as CAB archive files containing a binary firmware image. In all cases, firmware images were found to have no authentication (in the form of firmware signing) and only relied on insecure checksums for regular integrity checks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Emerson ControlWave 'Next Generation' RTUs use the BSAP-IP protocol to receive firmware updates delivered as CAB archive files containing binary firmware images. The firmware images lack cryptographic signing and rely solely on insecure checksums for integrity verification, allowing attackers to potentially inject malicious firmware via man-in-the-middle attacks or compromised update distribution channels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2022-05-02<= 2022-05-02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ControlWave PAC or Micro RTUs on the networkInventory network devices and identify Emerson ControlWave PAC and ControlWave Micro RTUs. These are typically found on industrial networks using BSAP-IP protocol on port 102/tcp. Check device listings, network scans, or DCS/PLC configurations for these specific device types.Affected if ControlWave PAC or Micro RTUs are present in the environment
-
Check installed firmware versionAccess the RTU via its management interface (web UI, console, or Emerson configuration software) and retrieve the firmware version and build date. Compare the version date against the <= 2022-05-02 threshold.Affected if Firmware version date is on or before 2022-05-02
-
Verify BSAP-IP protocol configuration for firmware updatesCheck the RTU configuration for BSAP-IP protocol settings. In the ControlWave Manager or similar Emerson configuration tool, examine the protocol configuration to confirm BSAP-IP is enabled for remote firmware delivery.Affected if BSAP-IP protocol is enabled and configured for firmware updates
-
Confirm integrity verification methodInspect the firmware update process and CAB archive handling. Check if the RTU bootloader or update mechanism validates firmware using only checksums (e.g., CRC, MD5) rather than cryptographic signatures. This may be visible in update logs, bootloader configuration, or firmware metadata within the CAB file.Affected if Firmware updates rely solely on checksum-based integrity verification without cryptographic signing
The environment is affected if ControlWave PAC or Micro RTUs with firmware dated 2022-05-02 or earlier are configured to receive firmware updates via BSAP-IP protocol using only checksum verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement cryptographic firmware signing using industry-standard methods (e.g., RSA-2048 or ECDSA) and verify signatures in the RTU bootloader before applying any firmware update, replacing the current checksum-based integrity check.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation40.0 h
- Testing20.0 h
- Review / QA12.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $23,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-30262 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-30262 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data