CVE-2022-30290
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn OpenCTI through 5.2.4, a broken access control vulnerability has been identified in the profile endpoint. An attacker can abuse the identified vulnerability in order to arbitrarily change their registered e-mail address as well as their API key, even though such action is not possible through the interface, legitimately.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOpenCTI versions through 5.2.4 contain a broken access control vulnerability in the profile endpoint that allows authenticated users to modify their registered email address and API key through direct API manipulation, bypassing restrictions enforced in the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed OpenCTI versionLocate the OpenCTI version information in the application frontend, configuration files, or container metadata. Common locations include the About section in the web UI, Docker image tags, or version configuration files.Affected if The installed version is 5.2.4 or earlier (any version through 5.2.4)
-
Confirm API endpoint accessibilityVerify that the profile API endpoint is accessible to authenticated users by reviewing API routing configuration or testing with a low-privilege authenticated session.Affected if Authenticated users can access the profile API endpoint at /api/users/me or similar profile modification routes
-
Test API vs web interface validation consistencyCompare the validation enforced by the web interface for email and API key modifications against the validation enforced by the direct API endpoint. Submit a profile modification request via the API with values that the web interface would reject.Affected if The API endpoint accepts modifications (email address or API key changes) that the web interface blocks, indicating the API bypasses web interface restrictions
-
Review API request parameters acceptedInspect the API request schema or endpoint code to determine if the profile update endpoint accepts email and api_key fields as writable parameters.Affected if The profile update API endpoint accepts and processes email or api_key parameter modifications
The environment is affected if running OpenCTI version 5.2.4 or earlier and the profile API endpoint allows authenticated users to modify their email address or API key in ways that the web interface restricts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to OpenCTI version 5.2.5 or later which addresses the broken access control in the profile endpoint.
OpenCTI 5.2.5 or later
- 1. Backup your current OpenCTI installation and database before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. Check the official OpenCTI GitHub repository (github.com) for the release notes of version 5.2.5 or later to confirm the security fix.
- 3. Follow the standard OpenCTI upgrade procedure documented in the official installation guide.
- 4. After upgrading, verify that the profile endpoint now properly enforces authorization checks.
- 5. Confirm that users can no longer arbitrarily modify their email address or API key through direct API calls that should be restricted.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-30290 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-30290 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data