CVE-2022-30292
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in sqbaselib.cpp in SQUIRREL 3.2 due to lack of a certain sq_reservestack call.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in sqbaselib.cpp in SQUIRREL 3.2 scripting language library. The vulnerability stems from a missing sq_reservestack call that should reserve stack memory before certain operations, leading to insufficient buffer allocation and subsequent heap overflow when the reserved stack capacity is exceeded.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 35= 36= 3.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Squirrel versionRun 'squirrel --version' or check the library file version. If using a package manager, run 'rpm -qa | grep squirrel' on Fedora or check installed packages via your package manager. Also check for libsqstdlib or sqbase libraries: 'ldconfig -p | grep squirrel' or inspect the compiled binary/library for version strings.Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.2 or falls within the affected range (Squirrel 3.2, Fedora 35 or 36).
-
Locate the vulnerable library fileFind the sqbaselib.cpp compiled library: typical paths include /usr/lib/, /usr/local/lib/, or within the application's bundle. Search for 'sqbaselib' files: 'find / -name '*sqbase*' -o -name '*squirrel*' 2>/dev/null'. Check file properties to confirm it belongs to Squirrel 3.2.Affected if The sqbaselib library from Squirrel 3.2 is present on the system.
-
Verify the missing sq_reservestack call in source or binaryIf source code is available, grep for 'sq_reservestack' in sqbaselib.cpp around the vulnerable functions. If only the binary/library is available, check if the binary contains symbols or strings related to stack reservation: 'strings libsqstdlib.so | grep -i reserve' or use disassembler analysis to check if sq_reservestack is invoked before stack-intensive operations.Affected if The sq_reservestack call is missing before stack operations that could exceed buffer capacity, indicating the unpatched version.
-
Check application configuration for vulnerable stack usageReview application logs, configurations, or code that invokes Squirrel interpreter functions that trigger the affected sqbaselib.cpp functions (typically those involving string manipulation or array operations that push many items onto the stack). Look for scripts that pass large input or create large arrays.Affected if The application uses Squirrel scripts or configurations that could trigger stack operations exceeding the unreserved capacity, leading to heap overflow.
A system is affected if it runs Squirrel version 3.2 or ships the unpatched sqbaselib library from that version, particularly on Fedora 35 or 36, and executes scripts or operations that push data onto the Squirrel stack beyond allocated buffer capacity.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patch for SQUIRREL 3.2 that adds the missing sq_reservestack call in sqbaselib.cpp, or upgrade to a patched version if available; prioritize given CRITICAL severity.
Squirrel 3.2.1 or later version containing the fix (check GitHub releases for availability)
- 1. Navigate to the Squirrel source code directory containing sqbaselib.cpp
- 2. Locate the function that handles stack operations where sq_reservestack is missing
- 3. Apply the fix from commit a6413aa690e0bdfef648c68693349a7b878fe60d which adds the sq_reservestack call to prevent heap-based buffer overflow
- 4. Recompile the Squirrel interpreter/library with the patched source code
- 5. Replace the existing squirrel interpreter/library binaries with the newly compiled fixed versions
- 6. Verify the fix by testing the interpreter with the previously vulnerable code paths
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-30292 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-30292 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data