CVE-2022-30534
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn OS command injection vulnerability exists in the aVideoEncoder chunkfile functionality of WWBN AVideo 11.6 and dev master commit 3f7c0364. A specially-crafted HTTP request can lead to arbitrary command execution. An attacker can send an HTTP request to trigger this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOS command injection vulnerability in the aVideoEncoder chunkfile functionality of WWBN AVideo 11.6 and dev master commit 3f7c0364 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via specially-crafted HTTP requests by injecting malicious commands into the chunkfile processing logic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed AVideo versionLocate the version file or admin panel that displays the AVideo software version. This is typically found in the platform's about page, version info file, or admin dashboard.Affected if The installed version is 11.6 or the specific commit 3f7c0364.
-
Confirm aVideoEncoder is installed and activeCheck if the aVideoEncoder component is present in the AVideo installation. This is usually a separate encoder service or module integrated with the main platform.Affected if aVideoEncoder is installed and processing media files.
-
Determine if chunkfile functionality is accessibleIdentify whether the chunkfile upload/processing endpoint is exposed. This feature handles chunked file uploads for video encoding.Affected if The chunkfile upload endpoint is reachable via HTTP without additional authentication beyond standard AVideo access controls.
-
Review web server and application logs for suspicious chunkfile requestsSearch access logs for requests to chunkfile-related endpoints. Look for unusual characters, pipes, semicolons, or command separators in filename or parameter values.Affected if Logs show chunkfile requests containing shell metacharacters (such as ; | & $ ` or command substitution patterns) that could indicate exploitation attempts.
-
Check for unexpected system commands or processesReview any available process logs or command audit logs on the web server for unfamiliar commands executed by the web server user.Affected if Commands were executed by the web server process that were not part of legitimate video encoding operations.
You are affected if running AVideo version 11.6 with aVideoEncoder and chunkfile functionality enabled, and especially if logs show suspicious command injection patterns in chunkfile requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied parameters in the chunkfile functionality, preferably using allowlists and avoiding shell execution; replace system command calls with safe APIs or parameterized functions.
AVideo 12.0 or later stable release (contains fix for commit after 3f7c0364)
- 1. Backup your current AVideo installation and database before making any changes.
- 2. Navigate to your AVideo installation directory.
- 3. Update to the latest stable release of AVideo (version 12.0 or later) using your preferred method (git pull, download from official source, or your system's package manager).
- 4. Verify the aVideoEncoder.php file has been updated to include proper input sanitization for the chunkfile parameter.
- 5. Test that the aVideoEncoder functionality works correctly with the update.
- 6. Monitor for any unusual activity or errors in your web server logs.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-30534 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-30534 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data