CVE-2022-30784
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA crafted NTFS image can cause heap exhaustion in ntfs_get_attribute_value in NTFS-3G through 2021.8.22.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in NTFS-3G versions through 2021.8.22 allows a crafted NTFS image to cause heap exhaustion in the ntfs_get_attribute_value function. When mounting a maliciously constructed NTFS filesystem, the driver attempts excessive memory allocation, leading to resource exhaustion and potential denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0= 35= 36<= 2021.8.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if NTFS-3G is installedRun 'ntfs-3g --version' or 'which ntfs-3g' to verify the utility is present on the systemAffected if NTFS-3G is not installed means not affected by this vulnerability
-
Identify the installed NTFS-3G versionRun 'ntfs-3g --version' to display the version number, or use 'dpkg -l ntfs-3g' on Debian-based systems, or 'rpm -qi ntfs-3g' on Fedora-based systemsAffected if Version is not displayed or the package is not found indicates NTFS-3G is not in use
-
Compare version against affected rangeReview the output from step 2. The vulnerability affects versions through 2021.8.22. If the version shown is 2021.8.22 or earlier, the installation is within the affected rangeAffected if Installed version is 2021.8.22 or earlier (for example, 2021.4.22, 2020.10.9, etc.)
-
Determine if NTFS mounting capability is in useCheck for ntfs-3g in running processes, mounted filesystems reported by 'df -T', or system services that may auto-mount NTFS devicesAffected if NTFS-3G is actively used to mount NTFS filesystems, particularly from untrusted sources, increases exposure to the vulnerability
A system is affected if NTFS-3G version 2021.8.22 or earlier is installed and is used to mount NTFS filesystems, as the heap exhaustion flaw triggers when mounting a crafted malicious NTFS image.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate NTFS-3G to version 2021.8.22 or later. Avoid mounting untrusted or unknown NTFS images from unverified sources.
NTFS-3G version 2022.10.3 or later
- 1. Check the currently installed NTFS-3G version using: `ntfs-3g --version`
- 2. Update the NTFS-3G package to the latest available version using your distribution's package manager
- 3. For Debian: `sudo apt update && sudo apt install ntfs-3g`
- 4. For Fedora: `sudo dnf update ntfs-3g`
- 5. Verify the updated version is newer than 2021.8.22
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-30784 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-30784 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data