CVE-2022-30788
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA crafted NTFS image can cause a heap-based buffer overflow in ntfs_mft_rec_alloc in NTFS-3G through 2021.8.22.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the ntfs_mft_rec_alloc function of NTFS-3G (versions up to 2021.8.22). When mounting a specially crafted malicious NTFS image, the allocator fails to properly validate bounds, leading to heap memory corruption that could enable arbitrary code execution or cause a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 35= 36= 9.0= 10.0= 11.0<= 2021.8.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check NTFS-3G package version on Debian/UbuntuRun `dpkg -l | grep ntfs-3g` or `apt show ntfs-3g` to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The version displayed is 1:2021.8.22 or earlier
-
Check NTFS-3G package version on Fedora/RHELRun `rpm -qa | grep ntfs-3g` or `dnf list installed ntfs-3g` to retrieve the installed version numberAffected if The version displayed is 2021.8.22 or earlier
-
Check NTFS-3G binary version directlyRun `ntfs-3g --version` to see the version string reported by the binary itselfAffected if The output shows version 2021.8.22 or any version earlier than 2021.8.22
-
Identify if NTFS-3G is used for NTFS mount operationsCheck for ntfs-3g in `/sbin/mount.ntfs` or run `mount | grep ntfs` to see active NTFS mountsAffected if NTFS-3G is present and used to mount NTFS volumes from external or untrusted sources
A system is affected if NTFS-3G version 2021.8.22 or earlier is installed and used to mount NTFS images, particularly from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade NTFS-3G to a version beyond 2021.8.22 or apply the vendor-supplied patch; avoid mounting untrusted or unknown NTFS images from external sources until the update is applied.
NTFS-3G version newer than 2021.8.22 (e.g., 2022.10.3 or later)
- 1. Check the current NTFS-3G version installed: 'ntfs-3g --version' or 'dpkg -l | grep ntfs-3g' (Debian) / 'rpm -qa | grep ntfs-3g' (Fedora)
- 2. Update the package repository: 'sudo dnf check-update' (Fedora) or 'sudo apt-get update' (Debian)
- 3. Upgrade NTFS-3G to the latest available version: 'sudo dnf upgrade ntfs-3g' (Fedora) or 'sudo apt-get install ntfs-3g' (Debian)
- 4. Verify the installed version is newer than 2021.8.22
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-30788 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-30788 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data