Promoted BuildsApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2022-30965

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-05-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.9 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Promoted Builds (Simple) Plugin 1.9 and earlier does not escape the name and description of Promotion Level parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Promoted Builds (Simple) Plugin versions 1.9 and earlier fails to properly escape the name and description fields of Promotion Level parameters when rendering them on parameter display views. This allows an attacker with Item/Configure permission to inject malicious JavaScript code into these fields, which is then stored and executed in the browsers of other users who view the affected parameter displays.

MitigationUpgrade the Jenkins Promoted Builds (Simple) Plugin to version 1.10 or later, which implements proper HTML escaping for Promotion Level parameter names and descriptions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Promoted BuildsApplication
Affected:<= 1.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Promoted Builds plugin version
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Promoted Builds (Simple)' or 'promoted-builds-simple' plugin. Note the version displayed.
    Affected if Plugin version is 1.9 or earlier
  2. Verify Promotion Processes exist
    Go to a Jenkins job that uses Promoted Builds. Click on 'Promotions' in the job's sidebar. Check if any promotion processes are configured.
    Affected if At least one Promotion Process is configured for any job
  3. Examine Promotion Level parameter names
    In the promotion process configuration, look for the 'Promotion Level' section under 'Actions'. Click on the parameter name field and inspect if it contains HTML or script tags (such as <script>, <img onerror=>, javascript:, etc.).
    Affected if The parameter name field contains unescaped HTML or JavaScript content
  4. Examine Promotion Level parameter descriptions
    In the same Promotion Level configuration, check the 'Description' field for the parameter. Inspect whether it contains HTML tags, script elements, or event handlers.
    Affected if The description field contains unescaped HTML or JavaScript content
  5. Check rendered parameter display
    View the job or promotion status page in a browser. Right-click and 'View Page Source' or inspect the Promotion Level parameter section to see if the name/description is rendered with proper HTML escaping (e.g., &lt; instead of <).
    Affected if The rendered HTML shows raw unescaped characters like <script> rather than &lt;script&gt;

If the Promoted Builds (Simple) Plugin version 1.9 or earlier is installed AND Promotion Level parameters contain unescaped HTML/script content in their name or description fields that renders as raw HTML, the environment is affected by this stored XSS vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.9
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the Jenkins Promoted Builds (Simple) Plugin to version 1.10 or later, which implements proper HTML escaping for Promotion Level parameter names and descriptions.

Fix this in Promoted Builds Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-30965 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-30965 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data