CVE-2022-3101
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in tripleo-ansible. Due to an insecure default configuration, the permissions of a sensitive file are not sufficiently restricted. This flaw allows a local attacker to use brute force to explore the relevant directory and discover the file, leading to information disclosure of important configuration details from the OpenStack deployment.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in tripleo-ansible allows local attackers to discover a sensitive file with overly permissive access permissions. Due to an insecure default configuration, the file's permissions are insufficiently restricted, enabling brute-force directory exploration to reveal important OpenStack deployment configuration details.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 16.1= 16.2= 16.1= 16.2all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if tripleo-ansible is installedRun 'rpm -qa | grep tripleo-ansible' or 'pip list | grep tripleo-ansible' to see if the tripleo-ansible package is present on the systemAffected if The package is installed and the version falls within the affected ranges or is any version of Openstack Tripleo Ansible
-
Locate tripleo-ansible configuration directoriesSearch for directories containing 'tripleo' or 'tripleo-ansible' in common paths such as /etc, /opt, /home, or the user's working directory. Use 'find / -type d -name '*tripleo*' 2>/dev/null' to discover these directoriesAffected if Any tripleo-ansible configuration or working directories exist on the system
-
Check file permissions on sensitive configuration filesWithin the tripleo-ansible directories, identify configuration files (commonly YAML, YAML.j2, or conf files) and inspect their permissions using 'ls -la <file>'. Look for files with permissions 644, 666, or other overly permissive settings (readable by others or world-readable)Affected if Any configuration file containing deployment details such as passwords, tokens, credentials, or network configurations has permissions that allow reading by non-owner users (e.g., mode 644, 664, or 666)
-
Search for files with world-readable permissionsRun 'find <tripleo-directory> -type f -perm -004 2>/dev/null' to find all files readable by others within the tripleo-ansible directoriesAffected if Sensitive configuration or credential files are found with world-readable permissions (mode includes 4 or higher for others)
-
Inspect default configuration templatesExamine Jinja2 templates (files ending in .j2) and configuration defaults in the tripleo-ansible installation for any file paths referenced and verify their default permissions by checking the surrounding Ansible roles or playbooksAffected if The default configuration references a file path that is created with permissive default permissions (world-readable or group-readable)
The system is affected if tripleo-ansible is installed and any configuration file containing sensitive OpenStack deployment details (credentials, passwords, tokens, network configuration) is readable by non-owner users due to overly permissive file permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict file permissions on the sensitive configuration file (e.g., chmod 600 or more restrictive) and update the default configuration in tripleo-ansible to use secure permissions.
Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.3 or later (or latest available update containing the CVE-2022-3101 fix)
- Check for available Red Hat Security Advisories (RHSA) related to CVE-2022-3101 by running: sudo yum updateinfo list security CVE-2022-3101
- If a security update is available, apply it by running: sudo yum update
- Alternatively, upgrade Red Hat OpenStack Platform to version 16.3 or later which contains the fix
- For Tripleo Ansible, ensure all tripleo-ansible packages are updated to the fixed version
- After update, verify the fix by checking that the sensitive file permissions are properly restricted (e.g., chmod 600 or more restrictive on sensitive configuration files)
- Consult the official Red Hat Security Advisory for this CVE at access.redhat.com for complete patch details
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-3101 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-3101 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data