CVE-2022-31079
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKubeEdge is an open source system for extending native containerized application orchestration capabilities to hosts at Edge. Prior to versions 1.11.1, 1.10.2, and 1.9.4, the Cloud Stream server and the Edge Stream server reads the entire message into memory without imposing a limit on the size of this message. An attacker can exploit this by sending a large message to exhaust memory and cause a DoS. The Cloud Stream server and the Edge Stream server are under DoS attack in this case. The consequence of the exhaustion is that the CloudCore and EdgeCore will be in a denial of service. Only an authenticated user can cause this issue. It will be affected only when users enable `cloudStream` module in the config file `cloudcore.yaml` and enable `edgeStream` module in the config file `edgecore.yaml`. This bug has been fixed in Kubeedge 1.11.1, 1.10.2, and 1.9.4. As a workaround, disable cloudStream module in the config file `cloudcore.yaml` and disable edgeStream module in the config file `edgecore.yaml`.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceKubeEdge Cloud Stream server and Edge Stream server lack message size limits, allowing authenticated attackers to send arbitrarily large messages that exhaust memory and cause denial of service. The vulnerability only affects deployments with cloudStream module enabled in cloudcore.yaml and edgeStream module enabled in edgecore.yaml.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.9.4>= 1.10.0, < 1.10.2>= 1.11.0, < 1.11.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check KubeEdge versionRun 'kubeedge --version' or check the version of the cloudcore/edgecore binaries installed in your environmentAffected if Version is less than 1.9.4, or between 1.10.0 (inclusive) and 1.10.2 (exclusive), or between 1.11.0 (inclusive) and 1.11.1 (exclusive)
-
Locate cloudcore.yamlFind the cloudcore.yaml configuration file, typically in /etc/kubeedge/ or the directory where cloudcore configuration is storedAffected if File exists and cloudStream module configuration is present
-
Verify cloudStream module statusOpen cloudcore.yaml and search for the 'cloudStream' module entry. Check if it is set to 'true' or enabled in the modules sectionAffected if cloudStream module is enabled (set to true or present as enabled)
-
Locate edgecore.yamlFind the edgecore.yaml configuration file on edge nodes, typically in /etc/kubeedge/ or the edge node configuration directoryAffected if File exists and edgeStream module configuration is present
-
Verify edgeStream module statusOpen edgecore.yaml and search for the 'edgeStream' module entry. Check if it is set to 'true' or enabled in the modules sectionAffected if edgeStream module is enabled (set to true or present as enabled)
You are affected if your KubeEdge version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND both the cloudStream module in cloudcore.yaml and the edgeStream module in edgecore.yaml are enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.9.41.10.21.11.1
Upgrade to KubeEdge versions 1.11.1, 1.10.2, or 1.9.4, or disable the cloudStream and edgeStream modules in their respective configuration files as a workaround.
Upgrade to KubeEdge 1.9.4, 1.10.2, or 1.11.1 (or later stable release) depending on current version
- 1. Identify current KubeEdge version by running `kubeedge version` or checking the version of installed CloudCore and EdgeCore.
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade target based on current version: if running < 1.9.4, upgrade to 1.9.4; if running >= 1.10.0 and < 1.10.2, upgrade to 1.10.2; if running >= 1.11.0 and < 1.11.1, upgrade to 1.11.1.
- 3. For production environments, upgrade to the latest stable release (1.11.1 or later) to get all security fixes.
- 4. Follow the standard KubeEdge upgrade documentation for your deployment type (single-node or cluster).
- 5. After upgrade, verify CloudCore and EdgeCore services are running: `systemctl status cloudcore` and `systemctl status edgecore`.
- 6. Verify the fix by checking that the Stream servers now enforce message size limits.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-31079 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-31079 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data