CVE-2022-31474
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in iThemes BackupBuddy allows Path Traversal.This issue affects BackupBuddy: from 8.5.8.0 through 8.7.4.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceiThemes BackupBuddy plugin versions 8.5.8.0 through 8.7.4.1 contain a path traversal vulnerability that allows attackers to access files outside restricted directories by manipulating file paths with traversal sequences.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.5.8.0, < 8.7.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the BackupBuddy plugin installationCheck your WordPress installation's wp-content/plugins/backupbuddy directory, or view the installed plugins in the WordPress admin dashboard under PluginsAffected if The BackupBuddy plugin directory exists or the plugin appears in WordPress admin
-
Identify the installed version numberIn WordPress admin, click on the BackupBuddy plugin to view its details where the version is displayed. Alternatively, open the main plugin file (such as index.php or backupbuddy.php) and look for the version header comment at the top of the fileAffected if The version displayed is 8.5.8.0, 8.5.9.0, 8.6.0.0, 8.7.0.0, 8.7.1.0, 8.7.2.0, 8.7.3.0, 8.7.4.0, or 8.7.4.1 (any version from 8.5.8.0 through 8.7.4.1 inclusive)
-
Verify plugin activation statusCheck if the BackupBuddy plugin is currently activated in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins. If you have CLI access, you can use: wp plugin list --status=active --name=backupbuddyAffected if The plugin shows as activated or active on your site
-
Confirm web-facing exposureDetermine if the WordPress site is publicly accessible and check whether the BackupBuddy export/download functionality is accessible. Review your web server logs for requests to backupbuddy-related endpoints containing ../ traversal sequencesAffected if The site is live/publicly accessible and the BackupBuddy file handling functionality is reachable over the network
-
Compare version against affected rangeUsing the version found in step 2, verify whether it falls within >= 8.5.8.0 and < 8.7.5.0. Any version within this range is affected by the path traversal vulnerabilityAffected if The installed version is 8.5.8.0 or higher but lower than 8.7.5.0
You are affected if the BackupBuddy plugin is installed and activated with any version from 8.5.8.0 through 8.7.4.1, and the site is publicly accessible allowing potential attackers to exploit the path traversal flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.7.5.0
Update BackupBuddy to the latest version (beyond 8.7.4.1) which contains the patched code. Additionally, implement strict input validation on all file path parameters to prevent traversal sequences.
8.7.5.0 or later
- Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard where BackupBuddy is installed
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate BackupBuddy in the plugin list and check the version number
- Verify if the installed version is less than 8.7.5.0 (vulnerable versions: 8.5.8.0 through 8.7.4.1)
- If vulnerable, update BackupBuddy to version 8.7.5.0 or later via the WordPress plugin update mechanism
- Alternatively, download the latest version from ithemes.com and upload via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin
- After updating, verify the new version is 8.7.5.0 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-31474 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-31474 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data