Business Objects Business Intelligence PlatformApplication · Sap

CVE-2022-31598

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-07-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Due to insufficient input validation, SAP Business Objects - version 420, allows an authenticated attacker to submit a malicious request through an allowed operation. On successful exploitation, an attacker can view or modify information causing a limited impact on confidentiality and integrity of the application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an input validation vulnerability in SAP Business Objects version 420 where an authenticated attacker can submit malicious requests through an allowed operation, potentially allowing unauthorized viewing or modification of information due to insufficient server-side validation of user-supplied data.

MitigationImplement strict input validation and proper authorization checks on all user-supplied parameters and operations within SAP Business Objects to ensure requests cannot exceed their intended scope.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Business Objects Business Intelligence PlatformApplication
Affected:= 420

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm SAP Business Objects installation version
    Access the SAP Business Objects Central Management Console (CMC) or check system information. In CMC, navigate to the 'About' or 'System' section to view the installed version number.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 420 (version 420)
  2. Verify web interface accessibility
    Determine if the SAP Business Objects web interface (CMC/BI Launch Pad) is accessible over the network. Check firewall rules and network configuration.
    Affected if The web interface is accessible to authenticated users on the network
  3. Review audit logs for anomalous operations
    Access the SAP Business Objects auditing infrastructure through CMC. Navigate to the Audit section and review logs for operations that appear to exceed their intended scope or show unusual parameter patterns.
    Affected if Audit logs contain requests with unexpected parameters or operations that exceed normal user scope
  4. Check authentication configuration
    Review the SAP Business Objects authentication settings in CMC under 'Authentication'. Verify which authentication methods are enabled and whether they properly validate user credentials before allowing operations.
    Affected if Authentication is configured to allow user access without proper validation of request parameters

An environment is affected if SAP Business Objects version 420 is running and the web interface is accessible to authenticated users, particularly if audit logs show anomalous operations or input validation gaps exist in the authentication configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict input validation and proper authorization checks on all user-supplied parameters and operations within SAP Business Objects to ensure requests cannot exceed their intended scope.

Fix this in Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
27.0 hours of engineering $4,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-31598 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-31598 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data