CVE-2022-31669
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHarbor fails to validate the user permissions when updating tag immutability policies. By sending a request to update a tag immutability policy with an id that belongs to a project that the currently authenticated user doesn’t have access to, the attacker could modify tag immutability policies configured in other projects.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHarbor fails to validate user permissions when updating tag immutability policies, allowing an authenticated attacker to modify tag immutability policies in projects they don't have access to by manipulating the project ID in the API request. This is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) authorization bypass vulnerability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, < 2.4.3>= 2.5.0, < 2.5.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Harbor versionRun 'harbor -v' or check the Harbor UI under the ' Harbor version' field in the about page, or query the API endpoint /api/v2.0/systeminfoAffected if Installed version falls within 2.0.0 to <2.4.3 or 2.5.0 to <2.5.2
-
Identify if tag immutability policies are configuredQuery the Harbor API endpoint GET /api/v2.0/projects/{project_id}/immutabletagrules or navigate to each project in the UI under 'Tag Immutability' settingsAffected if Any project has tag immutability rules defined - the vulnerability enables unauthorized modification of these rules
-
Review audit logs for tag immutability policy changesCheck Harbor audit logs (accessible via UI under 'Logs' or via the API /api/v2.0/logs) for entries with action 'update-immutable-tag' - compare the acting user's project permissions against the project_id in each log entryAffected if Log entries show immutability policy modifications on projects where the acting user does not have project administrator or higher privileges
-
Inspect API access logs for anomalous project ID manipulationReview API gateway or Harbor access logs for POST/PUT requests to /api/v2.0/projects/*/immutabletagrules where the project ID in the URL differs from projects the authenticated user is authorized to accessAffected if API requests target immutability endpoints with project IDs outside the user's authorized projects
You are affected if your Harbor version is 2.0.0 through <2.4.3 or 2.5.0 through <2.5.2 AND you have tag immutability policies configured, with evidence of unauthorized modifications or suspicious API calls manipulating project IDs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.32.5.2
Apply the vendor-provided patch/upgrade to the fixed Harbor version. Until patched, implement additional access control validation at the API gateway layer or monitor for unauthorized tag immutability policy modifications across projects.
Upgrade to Harbor 2.4.3 (if on 2.0.x-2.4.x) or Harbor 2.5.2 (if on 2.5.x)
- 1. Identify the currently running Harbor version using the Harbor web interface or API
- 2. If running version 2.0.0 through 2.4.2, plan upgrade to version 2.4.3
- 3. If running version 2.5.0 or 2.5.1, plan upgrade to version 2.5.2
- 4. Review Harbor upgrade documentation for your deployment method (helm, operator, or direct installation)
- 5. Backup Harbor database and configuration before upgrading
- 6. Perform the upgrade following the official Harbor upgrade guide
- 7. After upgrade, verify the Harbor instance is operational
- 8. Test that tag immutability policies can only be modified by users with appropriate project permissions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-31669 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-31669 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data