CVE-2022-31764
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Lite UI of Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI allows an attacker to perform RCE by constructing a special JDBC URL of H2 database. This issue affects Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI version 3.0.1 and prior versions. This vulnerability has been fixed in ElasticJob-UI 3.0.2. The premise of this attack is that the attacker has obtained the account and password. Otherwise, the attacker cannot perform this attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI Lite UI contains a remote code execution vulnerability where an authenticated attacker can execute arbitrary code by constructing a malicious JDBC URL when configuring an H2 database connection. The vulnerability is fixed in version 3.0.2.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if ElasticJob-UI is deployedLocate the ElasticJob-UI application installation or service in your environment. Check for processes or services related to elasticjob-ui or the Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob UI component.Affected if ElasticJob-UI is present in the environment and its version is below 3.0.2
-
Determine the installed versionInspect the application metadata, build artifacts, or version file within the ElasticJob-UI installation directory. Compare the found version number against the affected range of versions prior to 3.0.2.Affected if The installed version is any version lower than 3.0.2
-
Verify Lite UI is accessibleCheck network configuration or service bindings to determine if the Lite UI web interface is exposed and reachable over the network. Review any proxy or firewall rules that may allow access.Affected if The Lite UI is network-accessible without additional authentication barriers beyond the application login
-
Confirm authentication is required for UI accessVerify that the Lite UI requires valid user credentials for access. Check if default credentials are in use or if the authentication module is properly configured.Affected if The Lite UI can be accessed with default credentials or weak passwords, or authentication can be bypassed entirely
A user is affected if ElasticJob-UI version is below 3.0.2 and the Lite UI is network-accessible with valid credentials, allowing an authenticated attacker to supply a malicious H2 JDBC URL for code execution.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.0.2
Upgrade to ElasticJob-UI version 3.0.2 or later. Since this attack requires valid credentials, enforce strong password policies and consider implementing network segmentation or MFA for administrative interfaces.
ElasticJob-UI 3.0.2
- 1. Stop the running Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI service
- 2. Back up the current ElasticJob-UI configuration and data directories
- 3. Download Apache ShardingSphere ElasticJob-UI version 3.0.2 from the Apache archive (e.g., https://archive.apache.org/dist/shardingsphere/elasticjob-3.0.2/)
- 4. Remove the old ElasticJob-UI installation files
- 5. Extract the new 3.0.2 version to the installation directory
- 6. Restore the backed-up configuration files to the new installation
- 7. Start the ElasticJob-UI service
- 8. Verify the service is running correctly and the UI is accessible
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-31764 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-31764 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data