GatewayApplication · Codesys

CVE-2022-31804

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2.3.9.38 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The CODESYS Gateway Server V2 does not verifiy that the size of a request is within expected limits. An unauthenticated attacker may allocate an arbitrary amount of memory, which may lead to a crash of the Gateway due to an out-of-memory condition.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CODESYS Gateway Server V2 fails to validate the size of incoming requests before allocating memory, allowing unauthenticated attackers to send specially crafted requests that cause excessive memory allocation and potentially crash the service via out-of-memory conditions.

MitigationIsolate the Gateway Server on a restricted network segment and apply vendor patches when available. Implement network-level rate limiting or firewall rules to limit exposure to unauthenticated requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GatewayApplication
Affected:>= 2.0, < 2.3.9.38

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify CODESYS Gateway Server V2 installation
    Locate the CODESYS Gateway Server V2 installation directory or check installed programs list on the system
    Affected if CODESYS Gateway Server V2 software is present on the system
  2. Determine installed version
    Use the product's version information dialog, check the executable file properties, or run the Gateway Server with version flag if available
    Affected if The version returned is >= 2.0 and < 2.3.9.38
  3. Verify Gateway Server is running
    Check if the Gateway Server service or process is currently active on the system
    Affected if The Gateway Server process is running and listening for network requests
  4. Assess network exposure
    Review network configuration to determine if the Gateway Server port is accessible from untrusted or external network segments
    Affected if The Gateway Server port is exposed to networks without authentication or rate limiting controls

The environment is affected if CODESYS Gateway Server V2 is installed with version 2.0 or higher but lower than 2.3.9.38, and the service is running and reachable on the network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2.3.9.38 or later
Fixed in 2.3.9.38
Interim mitigation

Isolate the Gateway Server on a restricted network segment and apply vendor patches when available. Implement network-level rate limiting or firewall rules to limit exposure to unauthenticated requests.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

2.3.9.38 or later

  1. 1. Download the CODESYS Gateway Server V2 version 2.3.9.38 or later from the official CODESYS customer portal (customers.codesys.com)
  2. 2. Stop the CODESYS Gateway Server service on the target system
  3. 3. Back up the current Gateway configuration files and installation directory
  4. 4. Install the updated Gateway Server version 2.3.9.38 or newer
  5. 5. Restore the backed-up configuration files if necessary
  6. 6. Start the CODESYS Gateway Server service
  7. 7. Verify the Gateway is running correctly and the version has been updated

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-31804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-31804 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data