CVE-2022-31810
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SiPass integrated (All versions < V2.90.3.8). Affected server applications improperly check the size of data packets received for the configuration client login, causing a stack-based buffer overflow. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the server application, creating a denial of service condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in SiPass integrated server applications (all versions < V2.90.3.8). The server improperly validates the size of data packets received during configuration client login, allowing an attacker to overflow a stack-based buffer. This enables an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the server application, creating a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.90.3.8CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SiPass Integrated Server installationLocate the SiPass integrated server application in your environment. Check for processes named 'SiPass' or 'Sipass Integrated Server' running on the system, or look for the installation directory (typically under C:\Program Files\Siemens\SiPass or similar).Affected if SiPass integrated server is installed and running in your environment
-
Determine installed SiPass versionRight-click the SiPass executable or access Help > About in the SiPass management interface to view the exact version number. Compare this version against the affected range: any version below V2.90.3.8 is vulnerable.Affected if The installed version is lower than V2.90.3.8
-
Verify configuration client login feature is enabledCheck the SiPass server configuration settings to confirm whether the configuration client login functionality is enabled. This feature typically listens on TCP ports used by SiPass for client-server communication (commonly port 3000 or configurable).Affected if The configuration client login interface is exposed and accessible on the network
-
Check network exposure of SiPass servicesReview firewall rules and network configurations to determine if the SiPass server ports are accessible from untrusted networks or the internet. Use netstat or firewall logs to identify external connectivity attempts.Affected if SiPass server ports are accessible from untrusted networks or directly from the internet
You are affected if SiPass Integrated Server is running with a version lower than V2.90.3.8 and the configuration client login feature is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.90.3.8
Upgrade SiPass integrated to version V2.90.3.8 or later to patch the vulnerability. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, implement network segmentation and restrict access to the SiPass server to trusted networks or IP addresses to reduce the attack surface.
SiPass Integrated V2.90.3.8
- 1. Identify the current version of SiPass Integrated by accessing the server management console or checking the application About/Help section
- 2. Navigate to the Siemens security advisory portal (cert-portal.siemens.com) or official Siemens support channels to obtain SiPass Integrated version 2.90.3.8 or later
- 3. Before upgrading, perform a complete backup of the SiPass Integrated database and configuration files
- 4. Stop the SiPass Integrated server application services
- 5. Install version 2.90.3.8 following the Siemens upgrade documentation procedures
- 6. Restart the SiPass Integrated server application services
- 7. Verify the server is running and accessible by attempting a configuration client login
- 8. Confirm the installed version is 2.90.3.8 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-31810 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-31810 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data