MatrixApplication · Squiz

CVE-2022-32277

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-09-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Squiz Matrix CMS 6.20 is vulnerable to an Insecure Direct Object Reference caused by failure to correctly validate authorization when submitting a request to change a user's contact details. NOTE: this is disputed by both the vendor and the original discoverer because it is a site-specific finding, not a finding about the Squiz Matrix CMS product.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Squiz Matrix CMS 6.20 contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the user contact details change functionality. The application fails to properly validate authorization when processing requests to modify user contact information, potentially allowing unauthorized users to alter another user's contact details. This is disputed by both the vendor and discoverer as a site-specific configuration issue rather than a core product vulnerability.

MitigationImplement proper authorization validation ensuring users can only modify their own contact details. Verify site-specific configuration aligns with Squiz Matrix CMS security best practices for access control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MatrixApplication
Affected:= 6.20

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Squiz Matrix CMS version
    Locate and inspect the CMS installation to determine the exact version number. Common methods include checking an admin dashboard 'About' page, examining version metadata files in the installation directory, or using administrative system information commands.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.20 (matches the affected version = 6.20).
  2. Identify user contact details functionality
    Locate the user contact details change or profile modification feature within the Squiz Matrix CMS interface. This is typically found in user settings, profile management, or account settings areas accessible to authenticated users.
    Affected if The user contact details change functionality exists and is accessible within the CMS.
  3. Examine authorization controls for contact modification
    Review the application's access control configuration or source code that governs the user contact details modification endpoint. Verify whether the system validates that the requesting user owns or has permission to modify the specific contact record being changed.
    Affected if The application does not properly validate that users can only modify their own contact details, allowing one user to alter another user's information.
  4. Check site-specific access control configuration
    Inspect the Squiz Matrix site-specific security and access control settings. Review role-based permissions, user group configurations, and any custom access rules that may govern contact information modification permissions.
    Affected if The site-specific configuration allows users to modify contact details for user accounts other than their own.

A user is affected if running Squiz Matrix CMS version 6.20 AND the site-specific configuration or authorization logic permits unauthorized modification of other users' contact details through the contact details change functionality.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization validation ensuring users can only modify their own contact details. Verify site-specific configuration aligns with Squiz Matrix CMS security best practices for access control.

Fix this in Matrix Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32277 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32277 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data