CVE-2022-32287
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA relative path traversal vulnerability in a FileUtil class used by the PEAR management component of Apache UIMA allows an attacker to create files outside the designated target directory using carefully crafted ZIP entry names. This issue affects Apache UIMA Apache UIMA version 3.3.0 and prior versions. Note that PEAR files should never be installed into an UIMA installation from untrusted sources because PEAR archives are executable plugins that will be able to perform any actions with the same privileges as the host Java Virtual Machine.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA relative path traversal vulnerability exists in the FileUtil class of Apache UIMA's PEAR management component. Attackers can craft malicious ZIP archives containing entry names with '../' sequences to write files outside the intended target directory during PEAR installation. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of file paths during ZIP extraction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate Apache UIMA installationSearch for Apache UIMA directories or JAR files (such as uimaj-*.jar) in the systemAffected if Apache UIMA software is present on the host
-
Check Uimaj versionExamine the version information of the installed Apache Uimaj JAR or library files, typically found in the filename or manifestAffected if The installed version is 3.3.0 or lower (any version <= 3.3.0)
-
Verify PEAR installation capabilityDetermine whether the PEAR management component (used for installing .pear files) is accessible or can be invokedAffected if PEAR file installation functionality is available in the environment
-
Inspect FileUtil path validationExamine the FileUtil class source or bytecode within the PEAR management component for handling of ZIP entry pathsAffected if The FileUtil class does not validate or reject path traversal sequences like '../' in ZIP entries before extraction
A system is affected if it runs Apache Uimaj version 3.3.0 or lower with the PEAR management component enabled, allowing installation of PEAR files from potentially untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDo not install PEAR files from untrusted sources. Implement strict path validation in the FileUtil class to reject ZIP entries containing path traversal sequences and verify canonical paths remain within the target directory before file extraction.
Apache UIMA 3.3.1 or later
- 1. Identify all systems running Apache UIMA version 3.3.0 or prior.
- 2. Back up the UIMA installation and any PEAR files before making changes.
- 3. Download Apache UIMA version 3.3.1 or later from the official Apache UIMA distribution repository.
- 4. Stop any running UIMA services or applications that use the UIMA framework.
- 5. Replace the existing UIMA installation with the new version, preserving configuration files.
- 6. Verify the FileUtil class in the PEAR management component has been updated to prevent path traversal.
- 7. Restart UIMA services and validate the installation.
- 8. Re-scan any previously processed PEAR files to ensure no malicious path traversal artifacts exist.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32287 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32287 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data