FerdiumApplication

CVE-2022-32320

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-07-17
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.8.1 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Ferdi through 5.8.1 and Ferdium through 6.0.0-nightly.98 allows attackers to read files via an uploaded file such as a settings/preferences file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A CSRF vulnerability in Ferdi (through 5.8.1) and Ferdium (through 6.0.0-nightly.98) allows remote attackers to trick authenticated users into uploading malicious files, specifically settings/preferences files, which can then be used to read arbitrary files from the server.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations including file uploads, and add strict server-side validation for uploaded files (verify file type, content, and sanitize file paths) to prevent arbitrary file read.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FerdiumApplication
Affected:= 6.0.0
FerdiApplication
Affected:<= 5.8.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Ferdi version
    Check the installed version of Ferdi (Getferdi) - look in application metadata, package.json, or the app's About section. On Windows check Program Files or AppData locations, on macOS check /Applications, on Linux check /opt or ~/.local/share
    Affected if Version is 5.8.1 or lower (any version up to and including 5.8.1)
  2. Identify installed Ferdium version
    Check the installed version of Ferdium - look in application metadata, package.json, or the app's About section. On Windows check Program Files or AppData locations, on macOS check /Applications, on Linux check /opt or ~/.local/share
    Affected if Version is 6.0.0-nightly.98 or the stable 6.0.0 release (the vulnerability affects both the nightly and stable versions listed)
  3. Verify authentication state to connected services
    Check if the user has any messaging services (Slack, Discord, etc.) connected and authenticated within the Ferdi/Ferdium application
    Affected if User is logged into any services through the app - the CSRF attack requires an authenticated session to exploit the file upload vulnerability
  4. Check settings import functionality
    Examine whether the application has a settings import or 'Import Recipe' feature that allows uploading JSON or configuration files from external sources
    Affected if The settings/preferences import feature is available and exposed - this is the vector through which malicious files are uploaded
  5. Confirm server-side file handling
    If you have access to the application's backend or can inspect network traffic when importing settings, verify whether uploaded files undergo server-side validation (checking file type, content sanitization, and path handling)
    Affected if There is NO server-side validation of uploaded settings files - this allows the arbitrary file read to succeed

A user is affected if they have Ferdi <= 5.8.1 or Ferdium 6.0.0 installed, are authenticated to services through the app, and can import settings files without proper server-side validation of file contents and paths.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.8.1
Interim mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations including file uploads, and add strict server-side validation for uploaded files (verify file type, content, and sanitize file paths) to prevent arbitrary file read.

Fix this in Ferdium Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32320 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32320 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data