CVE-2022-32475
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O with kernel 5.0 through 5.5. DMA attacks on the VariableRuntimeDxe shared buffer used by SMM and non-SMM code could cause TOCTOU race-condition issues that could lead to corruption of SMRAM and escalation of privileges. This issue was fixed in the kernel, which also protected chipset and OEM chipset code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInsydeH2O kernel 5.0-5.5 contains a TOCTOU race condition in VariableRuntimeDxe where DMA attacks on a shared buffer between SMM and non-SMM code can corrupt SMRAM and escalate privileges to SMM level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.0, < 5.2.05.27.27>= 5.3, < 5.3.05.36.27>= 5.4, < 5.4.05.44.27>= 5.5, < 5.5.05.52.27CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify InsydeH2O firmware versionRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or check UEFI/BIOS setup screen for the firmware version string (typically displayed as something like 5.x.x.xx)Affected if The version falls within these ranges: >=5.0 and <5.2.05.27.27, OR >=5.3 and <5.3.05.36.27, OR >=5.4 and <5.4.05.44.27, OR >=5.5 and <5.5.05.52.27
-
Confirm VariableRuntimeDxe driver presenceExtract and inspect the UEFI firmware image (using tools like uefi-firmware-parser or binwalk on a firmware dump) for the VariableRuntimeDxe driver; check if it is included in the firmware buildAffected if The VariableRuntimeDxe driver is present in the firmware and the version falls in the affected ranges above
-
Check for DMA protection controlsInspect chipset/OEM firmware settings accessible via UEFI setup or via 'intel_txt_setup' or similar OEM tools for DMA-related protections (such as IOMMU/SMM protection settings)Affected if DMA attacks are possible because IOMMU or SMRAM protection is not enabled or configured, and the firmware version is in the affected ranges
-
Inspect SMRAM configurationUse 'cdi' or 'Chipsec' framework to check SMRAM lock status and configuration; look for 'SMRAM' or 'DMA' related ACPI tables or chipset registers via 'readmsr' or similar low-level toolsAffected if SMRAM is not properly locked or protected against DMA access, and firmware version is in the affected ranges
You are affected if your InsydeH2O firmware version is >=5.0 but below the patched versions (5.2.05.27.27, 5.3.05.36.27, 5.4.05.44.27, or 5.5.05.52.27) and the VariableRuntimeDxe driver is present with unprotected DMA access to shared buffers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.05.27.275.3.05.36.275.4.05.44.27
Apply Insyde's kernel firmware update (5.0-5.5 patch) and ensure OEM chipset firmware updates are also applied. Verify SMRAM integrity post-update.
InsydeH2O kernel version 5.2.05.27.27, 5.3.05.36.27, 5.4.05.44.27, or 5.5.05.52.27 (depending on which branch is in use)
- 1. Identify the current InsydeH2O kernel version installed on the affected system (typically available in UEFI/BIOS setup or via system information tools
- 2. Determine which version branch (5.0, 5.3, 5.4, or 5.5) the current firmware is based on
- 3. Download the corresponding fixed firmware version from Insyde's official support website: 5.2.05.27.27 for 5.0-5.2 branch, 5.3.05.36.27 for 5.3 branch, 5.4.05.44.27 for 5.4 branch, or 5.5.05.52.27 for 5.5 branch
- 4. Apply the firmware update through the vendor's recommended process (typically via UEFI flash utility or through vendor management tools)
- 5. Verify the update was successful by confirming the new kernel version after reboot
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation5.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,344.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32475 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32475 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data