CVE-2022-32563
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Couchbase Sync Gateway 3.x before 3.0.2. Admin credentials are not verified when using X.509 client-certificate authentication from Sync Gateway to Couchbase Server. When Sync Gateway is configured to authenticate with Couchbase Server using X.509 client certificates, the admin credentials provided to the Admin REST API are ignored, resulting in privilege escalation for unauthenticated users. The Public REST API is not impacted by this issue. A workaround is to replace X.509 certificate based authentication with Username and Password authentication inside the bootstrap configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Couchbase Sync Gateway 3.x before 3.0.2, when configured to authenticate with Couchbase Server using X.509 client certificates, the admin credentials submitted to the Admin REST API are silently ignored during authentication. This allows any user to gain administrative privileges by simply providing any username to the Admin REST API without a valid password, since the system falls back to trusting the X.509 certificate chain for authentication while skipping credential validation entirely.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Couchbase Sync Gateway versionRun 'sync_gateway --version' or check the service log file for the version banner at startup, or query the GET / API endpointAffected if The installed version is 3.0.0 or 3.0.1 (any version >= 3.0.0 and < 3.0.2)
-
Identify the bootstrap configuration fileLocate the sync_gateway.json or the configuration file specified in the Sync Gateway startup command, commonly found in /opt/sync_gateway/etc/sync_gateway.json or /etc/sync_gateway/sync_gateway.jsonAffected if The configuration file exists and contains server authentication settings
-
Verify if X.509 client certificate authentication is configuredInspect the bootstrap configuration for the 'server' section and check for 'tls_cert_path' and 'tls_key_path' options under the server URL configuration, or look for 'x509_cert_auth: true' in the configurationAffected if The server configuration includes tls_cert_path and tls_key_path for client certificate authentication to Couchbase Server
-
Confirm the authentication method is certificate-basedCheck if the configuration does NOT contain 'username' and 'password' fields under the server section, which would indicate password-based authentication is not in useAffected if The server configuration relies solely on X.509 certificates for authentication without username/password credentials
You are affected if running Sync Gateway 3.0.0-3.0.1 AND the configuration uses X.509 client certificate authentication (tls_cert_path/tls_key_path) without username/password credentials for Couchbase Server connection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.0.2
Upgrade Couchbase Sync Gateway to version 3.0.2 or later. As a workaround, replace X.509 certificate-based authentication with username/password authentication in the bootstrap configuration until the upgrade can be completed.
Sync Gateway 3.0.2
- Upgrade Couchbase Sync Gateway to version 3.0.2 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32563 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32563 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data