CVE-2022-32629
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn isp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07310774; Issue ID: ALPS07310774.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing bounds check in the ISP (Image Signal Processor) component allows an out-of-bounds write, potentially enabling local privilege escalation from System execution privileges. The vulnerability stems from insufficient input validation in the ISP processing pipeline.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Android version is 12.0Go to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via ADBAffected if Android version equals 12.0 exactly
-
Confirm MediaTek chipset is in useRun 'getprop ro.hardware' or 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' via ADB to identify the SoC vendorAffected if Device uses a MediaTek chipset (hardware identifier contains 'mtk' or 'mediatek')
-
Check ISP component versionInspect MediaTek ISP driver version via 'cat /sys/class/video4linux/video*/name' or check vendor-specific ISP modules with 'lsmod | grep isp' via ADBAffected if ISP driver module is loaded and version cannot be verified against vendor patch ALPS07310774
-
Verify current privilege levelRun 'id' or 'whoami' via ADB shell to confirm execution contextAffected if Running with System-level privileges (not root, but elevated system access)
-
Check vendor security patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' via ADB to see installed security updatesAffected if Security patch level is earlier than the July 2022 Android security bulletin
Device is affected if running Android 12.0 on a MediaTek chipset with ISP component not patched with ALPS07310774 and the July 2022 security update not applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patch ALPS07310774 to address the missing bounds check in the ISP component. This is a MediaTek-specific patch for their ISP implementation.
Android 12.0 with September 2022 Security Patch Level (or later) that incorporates MediaTek patch ALPS07310774
- Check if your device has the September 2022 Android Security Patch Level or later installed, as MediaTek patches are delivered through Android's monthly security bulletins
- Go to Settings > About Phone > Software Information on the affected Android 12.0 device
- Verify the Security Patch Level under Android security bulletin listings (corp.mediatek.com reference ALPS07310774)
- If the device does not have the patch, check for a system update from your device manufacturer
- Apply any available system updates that include the September 2022 Android Security Bulletin or subsequent updates
- If no update is available from your device manufacturer, consider whether the device manufacturer has released a specific firmware update addressing this MediaTek ISP vulnerability
- For enterprise or managed devices, apply the update through your mobile device management (MDM) system after testing
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,520.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32629 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32629 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data