Security Directory Suite VaApplication · Ibm

CVE-2022-32757

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-06-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 8.0.1.19 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click Patch available

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security Directory Suite VA 8.0.1 through 8.0.1.19 uses an inadequate account lockout setting that could allow a remote attacker to brute force account credentials. IBM X-Force ID: 228510.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis

A detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security Directory Suite VaApplication
Affected:>= 8.0.1, <= 8.0.1.19

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 8.0.1.19
Vendor patch www.ibm.com →
Recommended fix Moderate confidence

IBM Security Directory Suite VA 8.0.1.20 or later

  1. 1. Identify the current version of IBM Security Directory Suite VA by checking the administration console or using the version command.
  2. 2. Navigate to IBM Security Directory Suite VA documentation or support portal for upgrade procedures.
  3. 3. Back up the current IBM Security Directory Suite VA configuration and database before upgrading.
  4. 4. Download the latest version (8.0.1.20 or later) or the appropriate fix pack from IBM Fix Central or the support portal.
  5. 5. Apply the upgrade following IBM's standard upgrade procedure for Security Directory Suite VA.
  6. 6. After upgrade, configure appropriate account lockout settings in the security configuration to mitigate brute force attacks (e.g., set maximum failed login attempts to 3-5, configure lockout duration).
  7. 7. Verify the version has been updated and test authentication to confirm the fix is applied.
Caveat Standard minor version upgrade; review IBM release notes for any configuration changes or deprecations

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

We can identify the exact fixed release, upgrade, and verify it in staging — typical engagement from $1,950. Get the upgrade done

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32757 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32757 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data