CVE-2022-32953
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Insyde InsydeH2O with kernel 5.0 through 5.5. DMA attacks on the SdHostDriver buffer used by SMM and non-SMM code could cause TOCTOU race-condition issues that could lead to corruption of SMRAM and escalation of privileges. This attack can be mitigated by using IOMMU protection for the ACPI runtime memory used for the command buffer. This attack can be mitigated by copying the link data to SMRAM before checking it and verifying that all pointers are within the buffer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceTOCTOU race condition in SdHostDriver buffer in InsydeH2O kernel 5.0-5.5 allows DMA attacks to corrupt SMRAM and escalate privileges. The vulnerability exists because SMM and non-SMM code share the same buffer without proper synchronization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.0, < 5.2.05.27.27>= 5.3, < 5.3.05.36.27>= 5.4, < 5.4.05.44.27>= 5.5, < 5.5.05.52.27CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed InsydeH2O firmware versionRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or 'dmidecode -s bios-release-date' from terminal. The version string typically appears as a format like 5.xx.xx.xxAffected if The displayed version falls within any of these ranges: >= 5.0 and < 5.2.05.27.27; >= 5.3 and < 5.3.05.36.27; >= 5.4 and < 5.4.05.44.27; >= 5.4 and < 5.4.05.44.27; >= 5.5 and < 5.5.05.52.27
-
Verify the BIOS vendor is InsydeRun 'dmidecode -s bios-vendor' to confirm the firmware was developed by InsydeAffected if The vendor is Insyde and the version from step 1 is in the affected ranges
-
Confirm System Management Mode (SMM) is enabledCheck UEFI/BIOS settings or verify via 'dmidecode' that SMM is active. This is typically enabled by default on consumer systemsAffected if SMM is enabled and the firmware version is vulnerable - the race condition only affects shared buffers between SMM and non-SMM code when SMM is active
-
Check for SD host controller hardwareRun 'lspci | grep -i sd' or check if an SD card reader is present in the system hardwareAffected if The system has an SD host controller and the firmware version is in the affected ranges - this indicates the SdHostDriver component is likely loaded
You are affected if the system uses InsydeH2O firmware version 5.0 to 5.5 within the specific patch gaps listed, with SMM enabled and SD host controller hardware present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.05.27.275.3.05.36.275.4.05.44.27
Apply vendor firmware update from Insyde; alternatively, enable IOMMU protection for ACPI runtime memory used for command buffers, or implement the in-firmware mitigation of copying link data to SMRAM before pointer validation.
InsydeH2O version 5.2.05.27.27 or later (for 5.0-5.2 branch), 5.3.05.36.27 or later (for 5.3 branch), 5.4.05.44.27 or later (for 5.4 branch), or 5.5.05.52.27 or later (for 5.5 branch)
- Check current InsydeH2O firmware version via BIOS setup utility or system information tool
- Download the appropriate firmware update from the system manufacturer's support website
- Follow the manufacturer's instructions to apply the firmware update, typically using a BIOS update utility or firmware flashing process
- Verify the firmware has been updated to a fixed version (5.2.05.27.27+, 5.3.05.36.27+, 5.4.05.44.27+, or 5.5.05.52.27+)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,896.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-32953 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-32953 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data