CVE-2022-33047
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOTFCC v0.10.4 was discovered to contain a heap buffer overflow after free via otfccbuild.c.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceOTFCC v0.10.4 contains a heap buffer overflow after free (use-after-free) vulnerability in the otfccbuild.c component. This memory corruption issue allows an attacker to trigger the vulnerability during font processing, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution due to the critical CVSS score of 9.8.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.10.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed OTFCC versionRun 'otfccbuild -V' or check the binary version metadata using 'otfccdump --version' if availableAffected if The version displayed is 0.10.4 exactly
-
Locate otfccbuild binarySearch for the otfccbuild executable in common paths like /usr/bin/, /usr/local/bin/, or via 'which otfccbuild'Affected if The otfccbuild binary exists and is version 0.10.4
-
Verify otfccbuild.c compiled binaryCheck if otfccbuild has been compiled from source by inspecting the binary with 'file otfccbuild' or reviewing build documentationAffected if The binary was built from the v0.10.4 source release containing the vulnerable otfccbuild.c component
-
Confirm font processing activityReview logs, cron jobs, or automation scripts that invoke otfccbuild to process font filesAffected if OTFCC is actively used to build or process font files with the vulnerable version present
A user is affected if they are running OTFCC version 0.10.4 and using the otfccbuild component to process font files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of OTFCC if available; otherwise upgrade to the latest stable release. If patching is not immediately feasible, restrict processing of untrusted font files and sanitize input to mitigate exploitation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-33047 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-33047 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data