CVE-2022-33263
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory corruption due to use after free in Core when multiple DCI clients register and deregister.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in the Core component where memory corruption occurs when multiple DCI clients perform registration and deregistration operations. The vulnerability stems from improper memory lifecycle management during concurrent client registration/deregistration events, allowing freed memory to be accessed after being returned to the allocator.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset model in your deviceCheck system information or device specifications to determine if the device uses one of the affected Qualcomm chipsets (Aqt1000, Wcn3991, Wcn3998, Wcn6750, Wcn685x, or Wcn785x). This may be found in /proc/cpuinfo, lsusb, dmesg, or device documentation.Affected if The device contains any of the listed Qualcomm chipset models (Aqt1000, Wcn3991, Wcn3998, Wcn6750, Wcn685x 1/5, or Wcn785x 1/5).
-
Check the firmware version of the Qualcomm chipsetRetrieve the firmware version using chipset-specific commands (such as 'atfwd --version', 'diag version', or vendor-specific tools) or by reading firmware version files in /firmware or /vendor/firmware. Compare against the affected version ranges listed.Affected if The firmware version falls within the affected ranges or, per the advisory, if the device uses any version of the listed firmware (the advisory lists 'all versions' for each product).
-
Verify if DCI (Diagnostic Control Interface) feature is enabledCheck system logs, kernel configuration, or runtime settings to determine whether the DCI client interface is active. This may involve checking /dev/diag, looking for 'DCI' in logcat output, or examining relevant kernel module加载 status.Affected if DCI feature is enabled and accessible on the device, as the vulnerability requires DCI client registration/deregistration operations to trigger.
-
Look for crash logs or memory corruption indicators related to DCI operationsSearch system logs (dmesg, logcat, /var/log/messages) for crash reports, use-after-free errors, or memory corruption that mention DCI, client registration, or client deregistration. Look for symptoms like 'UAF', 'use after free', 'memory corruption', or 'NULL pointer' in conjunction with DCI-related messages.Affected if Crash logs or memory corruption events are found that correlate with DCI client operations, indicating potential exploitation of this vulnerability.
If the device uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipset firmware versions with DCI enabled and exhibits crashes or memory corruption during DCI client registration/deregistration, the environment is likely affected by CVE-2022-33263.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper reference counting or ownership tracking for DCI client objects to ensure memory is not freed while still in use. Add synchronization primitives to prevent race conditions between registration/deregistration operations and ensure all pointers are nullified immediately after freeing associated memory.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-33263 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-33263 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data