CVE-2022-33324
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Resource Shutdown or Release vulnerability in Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R00/01/02CPU Firmware versions "32" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R04/08/16/32/120(EN)CPU Firmware versions "65" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R08/16/32/120SFCPU Firmware versions "29" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R08/16/32/120PSFCPU Firmware versions "08" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-R Series R12CCPU-V Firmware versions "17" and prior, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELSEC iQ-L Series L04/08/16/32HCPU Firmware versions "05" and prior and Mitsubishi Electric Corporation MELIPC Series MI5122-VW Firmware versions "07" and prior allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service condition in Ethernet communication on the module by sending specially crafted packets. A system reset of the module is required for recovery.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisA detailed technical summary for this CVE is being prepared.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 33.0< 33.0< 33.0< 66.0< 66.0< 66.0< 66.0< 66.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped33.066.0
R00/R01/R02 to firmware >=33.0; R04/R08/R16/R32/R120 to firmware >=66.0
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the MELSEC iQ-R Series CPU module via the engineering workstation (GX Works3) or the module's front panel display.
- 2. Navigate to the official Mitsubishi Electric support page or the CISA advisory (icsa-22-356-03) to obtain the firmware update file.
- 3. For R00/01/02 CPU modules: upgrade to firmware version 33.0 or later.
- 4. For R04/08/16/32/120 CPU modules: upgrade to firmware version 66.0 or later.
- 5. Download the appropriate firmware update package for your specific CPU model.
- 6. Connect to the CPU module via the engineering station and initiate the firmware update process following the instructions in the Mitsubishi firmware update manual.
- 7. Verify the firmware version has been successfully updated after the process completes.
- 8. Test Ethernet communication functionality to confirm the module has recovered properly and is no longer vulnerable to the crafted packet DoS attack.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-33324 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-33324 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data