CVE-2022-33983
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDMA transactions which are targeted at input buffers used for the NvmExpressLegacy software SMI handler could cause SMRAM corruption through a TOCTOU attack. DMA transactions which are targeted at input buffers used for the software SMI handler used by the NvmExpressLegacy driver could cause SMRAM corruption through a TOCTOU attack. This issue was discovered by Insyde engineering based on the general description provided by Intel's iSTARE group. This issue was fixed in kernel 5.2: 05.27.25, kernel 5.3: 05.36.25, kernel 5.4: 05.44.25, kernel 5.5: 05.52.25 https://www.insyde.com/security-pledge/SA-2022053
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a firmware-level TOCTOU (Time-Of-Check-Time-Of-Use) vulnerability in Insyde's UEFI NvmExpressLegacy driver. Attackers with DMA capabilities can manipulate input buffers during the window between validation and use in the software SMI handler, allowing corruption of SMRAM (System Management RAM) used by System Management Mode (SMM). This enables execution of arbitrary code in the highest CPU privilege level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.2, < 5.2.05.27.25>= 5.3, < 5.3.05.36.25>= 5.4, < 5.4.05.44.25>= 5.5, < 5.5.05.52.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if the system uses Insyde UEFI firmwareRun 'dmidecode -s bios-vendor' or 'dmidecode -s bios-version' to determine if the BIOS/UEFI is provided by InsydeAffected if The BIOS vendor string contains 'Insyde' or 'InsydeH2O'
-
Determine the Insyde kernel version from firmwareExtract the firmware version string from dmidecode output (e.g., 'F50' or version numbers like 05.27') and map it to the Insyde kernel version numbering scheme, or consult Insyde documentation for version mappingAffected if The firmware version corresponds to an Insyde kernel version that falls within: 5.2 to <5.2.05.27.25, 5.3 to <5.3.05.36.25, 5.4 to <5.4.05.44.25, or 5.5 to <5.5.05.52.25
-
Verify presence of NvmExpressLegacy driver in UEFI firmwareDump the UEFI firmware (using tools like 'flashrom -r firmware.bin' or platform-specific tools) and search for the string 'NvmExpressLegacy' within the firmware imageAffected if The NvmExpressLegacy driver is found in the firmware dump, indicating it is included in the UEFI build
The system is affected if it uses Insyde UEFI firmware with a kernel version in any of the affected ranges and the NvmExpressLegacy driver is present in the firmware.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.05.27.255.3.05.36.255.4.05.44.25
Apply vendor-provided firmware updates from Insyde: kernel 5.2 to version 05.27.25 or later, kernel 5.3 to 05.36.25 or later, kernel 5.4 to 05.44.25 or later, and kernel 5.5 to 05.52.25 or later. Verify DMA protection settings in UEFI setup as an additional hardening measure.
Upgrade to Insyde kernel 5.2:05.27.25 or later (for 5.2.x), 5.3:05.36.25 or later (for 5.3.x), 5.4:05.44.25 or later (for 5.4.x), or 5.5:05.52.25 or later (for 5.5.x)
- Identify the current Insyde kernel version by checking the UEFI/BIOS setup or system information
- Download the updated UEFI/BIOS firmware from the system manufacturer that includes kernel version 5.2:05.27.25 (or later), 5.3:05.36.25 (or later), 5.4:05.44.25 (or later), or 5.5:05.52.25 (or later)
- Follow the manufacturer's instructions to apply the firmware update (typically via USB or from within the UEFI/BIOS setup)
- After the update completes, reboot the system and verify the new kernel version is installed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-33983 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-33983 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data