CVE-2022-33984
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDMA transactions which are targeted at input buffers used for the SdMmcDevice software SMI handler could cause SMRAM corruption through a TOCTOU attack. DMA transactions which are targeted at input buffers used for the software SMI handler used by the SdMmcDevice driver could cause SMRAM corruption through a TOCTOU attack. This issue was discovered by Insyde engineering based on the general description provided by Intel's iSTARE group. This was fixed in kernel 5.2: 05.27.25, kernel 5.3: 05.36.25, kernel 5.4: 05.44.25, kernel 5.5: 05.52.25 https://www.insyde.com/security-pledge/SA-2022054
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA TOCTOU (Time-of-Check-Time-of-Use) race condition in the SdMmcDevice driver's software SMI handler allows DMA transactions targeted at input buffers to corrupt SMRAM (System Management RAM). An attacker with DMA capabilities could exploit this to execute code in SMM (System Management Mode).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.2, < 5.2.05.27.25>= 5.3, < 5.3.05.36.25>= 5.4, < 5.4.05.44.25>= 5.5, < 5.5.05.52.25CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the InsydeH2O UEFI firmware versionRun `dmidecode -s bios-version` or check BIOS/UEFI setup screen for the firmware version string; InsydeH2O firmware typically displays a version like '5.2.05.27' or '5.3.05.36' in the BIOS infoAffected if The firmware version begins with kernel 5.2, 5.3, 5.4, or 5.5 and is earlier than 05.27.25 (for 5.2), 05.36.25 (for 5.3), 05.44.25 (for 5.4), or 05.52.25 (for 5.5)
-
Confirm the vendor is InsydeH2ORun `dmidecode -s bios-vendor` or check the BIOS setup screen for the firmware provider; InsydeH2O is a UEFI firmware framework used by many OEMsAffected if The BIOS vendor string contains 'Insyde' or 'InsydeH2O' and the version matches the affected ranges above
-
Check for presence of SdMmcDevice driverInspect UEFI firmware volumes or run `fwupdtpmevlog` or similar tools if available; the SdMmcDevice driver handles SD/MMC card access and creates a software SMI handlerAffected if The SdMmcDevice driver is present in the UEFI firmware and the firmware version falls within the vulnerable version ranges
-
Verify DMA and SMM are enabledCheck UEFI/BIOS settings for 'DMA' (often under Security or PCH settings) and 'SMM' (System Management Mode) availability; DMA must be enabled for the attack vector, and SMM must be present (default on most systems)Affected if DMA support is enabled in the firmware settings and the system uses SMM (standard on x86 platforms with SMRAM)
A system is affected if it runs InsydeH2O UEFI firmware with kernel versions 5.2 through 5.2.05.27.24, 5.3 through 5.3.05.36.24, 5.4 through 5.4.05.44.24, or 5.5 through 5.5.05.52.24, has the SdMmcDevice driver present, and has DMA capabilities enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.2.05.27.255.3.05.36.255.4.05.44.25
Apply the Insyde firmware updates: kernel 5.2 update to version 05.27.25 or later, kernel 5.3 to 05.36.25 or later, kernel 5.4 to 05.44.25 or later, and kernel 5.5 to 05.52.25 or later. Verify the current firmware version and apply vendor-supplied UEFI firmware patches.
Kernel 5.2: 05.27.25 or later; Kernel 5.3: 05.36.25 or later; Kernel 5.4: 05.44.25 or later; Kernel 5.5: 05.52.25 or later
- Identify the current kernel version by checking the system's firmware or boot logs
- Determine which kernel branch (5.2, 5.3, 5.4, or 5.5) the current version belongs to
- For kernel 5.2: upgrade to version 05.27.25 or later
- For kernel 5.3: upgrade to version 05.36.25 or later
- For kernel 5.4: upgrade to version 05.44.25 or later
- For kernel 5.5: upgrade to version 05.52.25 or later
- After upgrade, verify the new kernel version matches or exceeds the required fixed version for the respective branch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,080.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-33984 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-33984 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data