CVE-2022-34184
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins CRX Content Package Deployer Plugin 1.9 and earlier does not escape the name and description of CRX Content Package Choice parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins CRX Content Package Deployer Plugin versions 1.9 and earlier fails to properly escape the name and description fields of CRX Content Package Choice parameters when displaying them on parameter view pages. This creates a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability that can be exploited by users with Item/Configure permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed plugin versionNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'CRX Content Package Deployer' or 'crx-content-package-deployer'. Check the Version column to see if it shows 1.9 or earlier.Affected if The installed version is 1.9 or lower (e.g., 1.9, 1.8, 1.7, etc.)
-
Locate CRX Content Package Choice parameters in job configurationsReview each Jenkins job configuration that uses the CRX Content Package Deployer plugin. Go to each job > Configure > look for parameters of type 'CRX Content Package Choice' in the parameter section.Affected if The job has one or more CRX Content Package Choice parameters configured with non-empty name or description fields
-
Examine parameter field valuesIn the job configuration page, inspect the 'Name' and 'Description' fields of each CRX Content Package Choice parameter. Look for any HTML, JavaScript, or special characters that were entered.Affected if The name or description fields contain user-supplied values that could include script tags or HTML markup (the plugin does not escape these before rendering)
-
Verify parameter view page renderingNavigate to a job's parameter page (such as a build with parameters) and view the rendered CRX Content Package Choice parameters. Right-click and 'View Page Source' to examine how the name and description are rendered in HTML.Affected if The rendered HTML shows unescaped content from the parameter name or description fields, indicating the XSS vulnerability is present
A user is affected if the CRX Content Package Deployer plugin version is 1.9 or earlier AND CRX Content Package Choice parameters with name/description fields are configured in any job.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Jenkins CRX Content Package Deployer Plugin version 1.10 or later which includes proper escaping of parameter fields to prevent XSS attacks.
Version 1.10 or later
- Navigate to the Jenkins dashboard
- Go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins
- Locate the 'CRX Content Package Deployer' plugin in the 'Installed' tab
- Check the current version of the plugin
- If the installed version is 1.9 or earlier, click 'Update now' to upgrade to the latest available version
- Alternatively, download the latest version of the plugin from the Jenkins plugin repository
- Restart Jenkins if required after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34184 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34184 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data