Date ParameterApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2022-34185

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.0.4 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Date Parameter Plugin 0.0.4 and earlier does not escape the name and description of Date parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Date Parameter Plugin fails to escape user-supplied name and description fields for Date parameters when rendering parameter views, allowing injection of malicious scripts that execute when other users view the affected pages. This stored XSS requires Item/Configure permission to exploit, meaning an authenticated attacker with job configuration rights can inject the payload.

MitigationUpgrade to Date Parameter Plugin version 0.0.5 or later which properly escapes parameter names and descriptions. If upgrading is not immediately possible, restrict Item/Configure permission to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious parameter configurations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Date ParameterApplication
Affected:<= 0.0.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Date Parameter Plugin installation
    Navigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or use the CLI: `jenkins-cli.jar groovy --script 'println Jenkins.instance.pluginManager.plugins.find { it.shortName == "date-parameter" }?.version'
    Affected if Plugin is installed and version is 0.0.4 or lower (the vulnerable version range)
  2. Locate jobs using Date Parameter
    Search job configurations for '<dateParameter>' XML elements, or use Jenkins CLI: `jenkins-cli.jar list-jobs | xargs -I {} jenkins-cli.jar get-job {} | grep -i dateparameter`
    Affected if Any job is configured to use Date Parameter plugin (the vulnerable code path is triggered when Date Parameters exist)
  3. Inspect Date parameter name and description fields
    For each job with Date Parameters, view the job configuration under Parameters section. Examine the 'Name' and 'Description' fields of Date Parameter entries for unsanitized HTML or JavaScript syntax such as <script>, javascript:, onload, onerror, or other HTML tag injections
    Affected if Any Date Parameter has a name or description containing raw HTML tags, script elements, or event handler attributes (indicates exploitation in progress)
  4. Review user permissions on configured jobs
    Check who has Item/Configure permission on jobs with Date Parameters: Navigate to job > Configure > Apply, or review matrix authorization settings in Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security
    Affected if Untrusted or unknown authenticated users have Item/Configure permission on jobs using Date Parameters (allows the authenticated attack vector)

A user is affected if they have the Date Parameter Plugin version 0.0.4 or lower installed AND have jobs configured with Date Parameters accessible to users with configuration rights.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.0.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Date Parameter Plugin version 0.0.5 or later which properly escapes parameter names and descriptions. If upgrading is not immediately possible, restrict Item/Configure permission to trusted users only and monitor for suspicious parameter configurations.

Fix this in Date Parameter Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34185 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34185 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data