Dynamic Extended Choice ParameterApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2022-34186

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.0.1 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter Plugin 1.0.1 and earlier does not escape the name and description of Moded Extended Choice parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter Plugin versions 1.0.1 and earlier fails to properly escape HTML entities in the name and description fields of Moded Extended Choice parameters when rendered on parameter display views. This allows an attacker with Item/Configure permission to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the browsers of other users viewing those parameters.

MitigationUpdate the plugin to a version that properly escapes the name and description fields using appropriate HTML encoding functions. Until patched, limit Configure permission to trusted users only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Dynamic Extended Choice ParameterApplication
Affected:<= 1.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify the Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter plugin is installed
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter' in the list of installed plugins
    Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
  2. Confirm the installed version
    In the Installed plugins list, locate the Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter plugin and note the Version column. Compare this version to 1.0.1 or earlier
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0.1 or lower
  3. Identify jobs using Moded Extended Choice parameters
    Review job configuration files (config.xml) or manually inspect job configurations in the UI for 'Moded Extended Choice' parameter types in the Build Parameters section
    Affected if Any job contains a Moded Extended Choice parameter with custom name or description fields
  4. Check for untrusted users with Item/Configure permission
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Users and review which users have Item/Configure or Job/Configure permissions, particularly on jobs using the affected parameter type
    Affected if Users who are not fully trusted have Configure permission on jobs that use Moded Extended Choice parameters
  5. Inspect parameter name and description fields for unsanitized content
    View the configured Moded Extended Choice parameters in job configuration pages. Look at the Name and Description fields for any content that contains HTML markup, script tags, or special characters that might appear unescaped when rendered
    Affected if The name or description fields contain raw HTML, JavaScript, or appear to render as markup rather than plain text

A user is affected if the Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter plugin version 1.0.1 or earlier is installed AND Moded Extended Choice parameters are configured with untrusted users having Item/Configure permission.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.0.1
Interim mitigation

Update the plugin to a version that properly escapes the name and description fields using appropriate HTML encoding functions. Until patched, limit Configure permission to trusted users only.

Fix this in Dynamic Extended Choice Parameter Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,190
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34186 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34186 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data