CVE-2022-34197
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Sauce OnDemand Plugin 1.204 and earlier does not escape the name and description of Sauce Labs Browsers parameters on views displaying parameters, resulting in a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable by attackers with Item/Configure permission.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Sauce OnDemand Plugin versions 1.204 and earlier fails to properly escape the name and description fields of Sauce Labs Browser parameters when rendering them in the UI. This allows an attacker with Item/Configure permission to inject malicious JavaScript code that executes in the browsers of other users viewing those parameters—classified as a stored (persistent) XSS vulnerability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.204CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Sauce OnDemand plugin is installedNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Sauce OnDemand' or 'sauce-ondemand' in the list of installed plugins. Note the version number displayed.Affected if The plugin is installed and its version is 1.204 or earlier.
-
Identify jobs using Sauce Labs Browser parametersNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Script Console and run: Jenkins.instance.allItems.each { if (it.class.canonicalName == 'hudson.plugins.sauce_ondemand.SauceOnDemandBuildWrapper') { println it.fullName } } to list jobs using the Sauce OnDemand plugin.Affected if Any jobs are listed that use the Sauce OnDemand plugin.
-
Inspect Sauce Labs Browser parameter names and descriptions for malicious script contentFor each identified job, go to Job > Configure and review any 'Sauce Labs Browser' parameters added under the Build Environment section. Check the 'Browser' and 'Browser Version' name and description fields for suspicious content such as <script>, javascript:, onload, onerror, or other HTML/JS patterns.Affected if Any parameter name or description field contains HTML script tags, JavaScript event handlers, or other code that could execute in a browser.
-
Review user permissions for job configuration accessNavigate to the affected jobs and check who has Item/Configure permission via Matrix Authorization Strategy or Project-based Matrix Authorization Strategy in the job configuration or global security settings.Affected if Users who are not fully trusted have Item/Configure permission on jobs that use Sauce Labs Browser parameters.
A user is affected if the Sauce OnDemand plugin version 1.204 or earlier is installed AND there are jobs configured with Sauce Labs Browser parameters containing unsanitized content in the name or description fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the Sauce OnDemand plugin to version 1.205 or later which addresses the escaping issue. Until then, restrict Item/Configure permission to trusted users only and review existing job configurations for suspicious parameter values.
Sauce OnDemand plugin version > 1.204 (check Jenkins plugin repository for latest available version)
- 1. Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins
- 2. Select the 'Installed' tab
- 3. Locate the Sauce OnDemand plugin in the list
- 4. If an update is available, select the plugin and click 'Update'
- 5. After updating, restart Jenkins or wait for the plugin to reload
- 6. Verify the plugin version is updated to confirm the fix was applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34197 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34197 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data