Vrealize OrchestratorApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2022-34211
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins vRealize Orchestrator Plugin 3.0 and earlier allows attackers to send an HTTP POST request to an attacker-specified URL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in the Jenkins vRealize Orchestrator Plugin versions 3.0 and earlier allows attackers to exploit missing CSRF protection (likely missing Jenkins crumb token validation) to send HTTP POST requests to attacker-specified URLs, enabling authenticated users to be tricked into performing unintended actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Vrealize OrchestratorApplication
<= 3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if vRealize Orchestrator Plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'vRealize Orchestrator' or 'vRO' in the plugin listAffected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Determine the installed plugin versionIn the same Installed plugins tab, locate the vRealize Orchestrator plugin and note the Version column valueAffected if The version listed is 3.0 or earlier (e.g., 3.0, 2.x, 1.x)
-
Verify CSRF protection configurationNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security and check if 'CSRF Protection' is enabled under the Security realm or Authorization sectionAffected if CSRF protection is disabled or the plugin version is 3.0 or earlier regardless of this setting
A user is affected if the vRealize Orchestrator Plugin version is 3.0 or earlier, as this version lacks proper CSRF (crumb) token validation on form submissions and API endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade the vRealize Orchestrator Plugin to version 3.1 or later which includes proper CSRF protection via Jenkins crumb token validation on all form submissions and API endpoints.
vRealize Orchestrator Plugin version 3.1
- Upgrade the Jenkins vRealize Orchestrator Plugin to version 3.1 or later from the Jenkins plugin manager or Jenkins update center
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Vrealize Orchestrator
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34211 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34211 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data