CVE-2022-34301
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA flaw was found in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders before 2022-06-01. An attacker may use this bootloader to bypass or tamper with Secure Boot protections. In order to load and execute arbitrary code in the pre-boot stage, an attacker simply needs to replace the existing signed bootloader currently in use with this bootloader. Access to the EFI System Partition is required for booting using external media.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders allows an attacker to bypass Secure Boot protections by replacing the existing signed bootloader with a malicious one, enabling arbitrary code execution in the pre-boot stage. The attack requires physical access or access to the EFI System Partition to replace the bootloader file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0= 8.0= 9.0< 2022-06-01all versions= 20h2= 21h1= 21h2= 1607= 1809all versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= r2all versions= 20h2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine if CryptoPro Secure Disk software is installedOn Windows, check Program Files for CryptoPro folders or review installed programs list. On Linux, query package manager for cryptopro packages (rpm -qa | grep -i crypto or dpkg -l | grep -i crypto).Affected if CryptoPro Secure Disk software is present on the system
-
Identify the installed CryptoPro Secure Disk versionCheck the software version through its UI, registry (HKLM\SOFTWARE\Crypto Pro\Disk), or by examining the bootloader files themselves. For Windows, inspect the executable version info. For Linux, check rpm or dpkg package version.Affected if The version is older than the 2022-06-01 release or cannot be determined (unknown versions may be pre-fix)
-
Locate CryptoPro bootloaders on the EFI System PartitionMount the EFI System Partition (typically drive letter E: or mount point /boot/efi/EFI) and examine the \CryptoPro or similar directory structure. List all .efi bootloader files in the EFI folder.Affected if CryptoPro .efi bootloader files exist in the EFI System Partition and the version is vulnerable
-
Verify integrity and timestamps of bootloader filesCompare cryptographic hashes (SHA256) of existing CryptoPro .efi files against known-good baseline values if available. Alternatively, check file modification timestamps for unexpected changes.Affected if Bootloader files have been modified, show unexpected timestamps, or differ from expected hashes
-
Confirm Secure Boot statusUse system utilities: on Windows run 'msinfo32' and check 'Secure Boot State'; on Linux check 'mokutil --sb-state' or review UEFI firmware settings.Affected if Secure Boot is disabled (the vulnerability bypasses Secure Boot, but the attack surface is higher when Secure Boot is enabled but bypassed)
The environment is affected if CryptoPro Secure Disk is installed with a bootloader version released before 2022-06-01, or if unauthorized bootloader files are present on the EFI System Partition, regardless of Secure Boot status.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2022-06-01
Update CryptoPro Secure Disk bootloaders to a version released after 2022-06-01 that contains the security fix, and verify Secure Boot integrity configurations.
CryptoPro Secure Disk version >= 2022-06-01
- Identify the current version of CryptoPro Secure Disk installed on the affected system
- Download CryptoPro Secure Disk version released on or after 2022-06-01 from the official CryptoPro vendor
- Apply the upgrade following the vendor's documented upgrade procedure
- Reboot the system to ensure the new bootloader is loaded
- Verify the bootloader version post-upgrade to confirm the fix is applied
- Ensure Secure Boot remains enabled and functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34301 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34301 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data