CVE-2022-34338
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.0, 21.0.1, and 21.0.2 could disclose sensitive information due to improper privilege management for storage provider types. IBM X-Force ID: 229962.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Robotic Process Automation versions 21.0.0, 21.0.1, and 21.0.2 contain a privilege management flaw in storage provider type handling that allows unauthorized access to sensitive information. An authenticated attacker with limited privileges could exploit improper access controls on storage providers to view data they should not have permission to access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 21.0.0, < 21.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IBM RPA versionUse the product's version information command or check the About/Version section in the IBM RPA management console or installation directory. Common locations include the control panel, the installation log, or running 'docker ps' if containerized.Affected if The installed version is 21.0.0, 21.0.1, or 21.0.2 (any version >= 21.0.0 and < 21.0.3)
-
Confirm storage provider functionality is in useReview the IBM RPA configuration to determine if storage providers are configured. Check the system's storage provider settings, which may be accessible through the RPA management interface or configuration files.Affected if Storage providers are configured and actively used in the environment
-
Review storage provider access control configurationExamine the access control settings for storage providers within the IBM RPA administration panel. Look for permissions configurations that define which users or roles can access specific storage provider types and their data.Affected if Storage providers exist with access control configurations that permit users with limited privileges to access data outside their authorized scope
-
Verify privilege boundaries on storage provider dataInspect the storage provider permission model to confirm whether proper privilege isolation is enforced. Check if lower-privileged users can enumerate or access storage provider data belonging to higher-privileged users or other restricted data sets.Affected if Users with limited privileges can view or access storage provider data that should be restricted based on their role or permission level
A user is affected if they are running IBM RPA version 21.0.0 through 21.0.2 with storage providers configured, where improper access controls allow unauthorized data access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.0.3
Upgrade IBM Robotic Process Automation to version 21.0.3 or later per IBM's security bulletin. Alternatively, review and restrict storage provider access permissions to enforce proper privilege boundaries until the patch can be applied.
IBM Robotic Process Automation version 21.0.3
- Identify the currently installed IBM Robotic Process Automation version in your environment
- Review the IBM Robotic Process Automation 21.0.3 release notes to understand changes and any prerequisites
- Create a backup of your current RPA configuration and data
- Plan for appropriate maintenance window to perform the upgrade
- Download IBM Robotic Process Automation version 21.0.3 from IBM Fix Central or your authorized IBM distribution channel
- Stop all IBM RPA services before initiating the upgrade
- Install version 21.0.3 following IBM's standard installation documentation
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34338 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34338 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data