CVE-2022-34731
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMicrosoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability in Microsoft's OLE DB provider for SQL Server. The vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected systems via specially crafted queries or network packets, likely through memory corruption or improper input validation in the OLE DB provider component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= 20h2= 21h1= 21h2= 1607= 1809all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versions= r2all versions= r2all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if OLE DB Provider for SQL Server is installedOpen Registry Editor and navigate to HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\SQLOLEDB to see if the provider is registered. Alternatively, check for the presence of sqloledb.dll in the System32 or SysWOW64 directories.Affected if The SQLOLEDB provider registry key exists or sqloledb.dll file is present on the system.
-
Identify the OLE DB provider DLL versionLocate the sqloledb.dll file (typically in C:\Windows\System32\ or C:\Windows\SysWOW64\) and view its file properties to obtain the version number. Compare this version against the patched version.Affected if The DLL version is lower than the patched version or cannot be verified as updated.
-
Check for SQL Server Native Client OLE DB providerExamine registry keys under HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\ for SQLNCLI or SQL Server Native Client entries, and locate the corresponding DLL (sqlncli.dll) to check its version.Affected if SQL Server Native Client OLE DB provider is installed and its version is unpatched.
-
Review installed SQL Server componentsOpen Programs and Features (appwiz.cpl) and look for installations of SQL Server, SQL Server Native Client, or Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server.Affected if Any SQL Server or OLE DB provider component for SQL Server is installed on an affected Windows version.
-
Audit applications using OLE DB SQL connectionsReview application configurations and documentation to identify any applications configured to connect to SQL Server using OLE DB (SQLOLEDB or SQLNCLI providers).Affected if Applications are configured to use OLE DB connections to SQL Server on affected Windows versions.
The system is affected if OLE DB Provider for SQL Server (SQLOLEDB) or SQL Server Native Client OLE DB is installed on any of the affected Windows versions listed, regardless of whether the specific update KB5012344 has been applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Microsoft security updates (KB5012344 or subsequent patches) to address this vulnerability. Prioritize patching systems with direct SQL Server connectivity and ensure network segmentation limits exposure to unauthenticated attackers.
July 2022 Security Updates (KB5015827 and related patches for your Windows version)
- Check your current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo'
- Navigate to Windows Update settings (Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update)
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the July 2022 security updates
- Alternatively, download and install the specific security update for this CVE (KB5015827 or subsequent superseded updates) from the Microsoft Update Catalog
- Restart the system after the update is installed
- Verify the update was installed successfully by checking Windows Update history
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34731 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34731 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data