CVE-2022-34769
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMichlol - rashim web interface Insecure direct object references (IDOR). First of all, the attacker needs to login. After he performs log into the system there are some functionalities that the specific user is not allowed to perform. However all the attacker needs to do in order to achieve his goals is to change the value of the ptMsl parameter and then the attacker can access sensitive data that he not supposed to access because its belong to another user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIDOR vulnerability in Michlol rashim web interface allows authenticated users to access sensitive data belonging to other users by manipulating the ptMsl parameter value, bypassing insufficient authorization controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 187.4392CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Rashim Michlol installation and versionLocate the Rashim Michlol application and determine its installed version number. This may be found in the application itself, an about page, a configuration file, or the software inventory.Affected if The installed version is lower than 187.4392
-
Verify the web interface is accessibleConfirm the Rashim Michlol web interface is reachable via HTTP/HTTPS on the expected port or URL path.Affected if The web interface is exposed and accessible to users
-
Confirm ptMsl parameter usageInspect web traffic or application logs to identify if the ptMsl parameter is used in requests to access data or objects within the application.Affected if The ptMsl parameter is present in API calls or web requests within the application
-
Test for missing authorization on ptMslUsing an authenticated session, make a request with a ptMsl value that references an object belonging to a different user, and observe whether the application returns the data without verifying ownership.Affected if The application returns data for a ptMsl value referencing another user's object without proper authorization checks
-
Compare version to affected rangeDocument the exact version number found in step 1 and compare it against the vulnerable range of versions less than 187.4392.Affected if The installed version is below 187.4392 and the web interface with ptMsl parameter is in use
A user is affected if Rashim Michlol version is below 187.4392, the web interface is accessible, and the ptMsl parameter allows access to other users' data without proper authorization validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data187.4392
Implement server-side authorization checks to validate that the authenticated user has permission to access the requested object referenced by ptMsl, and consider using indirect object references.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34769 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34769 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data