RecipeApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2022-34793
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins Recipe Plugin 1.2 and earlier does not configure its XML parser to prevent XML external entity (XXE) attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Recipe Plugin versions 1.2 and earlier contains an XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability due to its XML parser not being configured to disable external entity processing. This allows attackers to inject malicious XML containing external entity references to potentially read local files, perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSR) attacks, or cause denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
RecipeApplication
<= 1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Jenkins Recipe Plugin is installedNavigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'Recipe' in the list of installed plugins.Affected if The plugin named 'Recipe' appears in the installed plugins list.
-
Identify the installed version of Jenkins Recipe PluginIn the Manage Plugins > Installed view, locate the Recipe plugin and note the version number displayed in the Version column.Affected if The installed version is 1.2 or any version lower than 1.2.
-
Verify the plugin is actively used in job configurationsReview Jenkins jobs that may use the Recipe plugin functionality. Check job configuration pages for Recipe-related build steps or publishers.Affected if Any Jenkins job is configured to use Recipe plugin features.
-
Check if XML files are processed by the pluginInspect job configurations that use the Recipe plugin to determine if they involve importing or processing XML files (such as configuration imports, XML-based recipes, or data file processing).Affected if Jobs using the Recipe plugin process XML input files.
A user is affected if Jenkins Recipe Plugin version 1.2 or lower is installed and jobs are configured to use the plugin's XML processing functionality.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataConfigure the XML parser with secure settings to disable external entity and external DTD access, typically by setting parser features such as ACCESS_EXTERNAL_DTD and ACCESS_EXTERNAL_SCHEMA to empty strings, and disable the XMLConstants.FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING feature where applicable.
Fix this in Recipe
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34793 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34793 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data