JigomergeApplication · Jenkins

CVE-2022-34806

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-06-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.9 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jenkins Jigomerge Plugin 0.9 and earlier stores passwords unencrypted in job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with Extended Read permission, or access to the Jenkins controller file system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Jenkins Jigomerge Plugin versions 0.9 and earlier stores passwords in plaintext within job config.xml files on the Jenkins controller filesystem. Users with Extended Read permission on Jenkins jobs can view these unencrypted passwords, or anyone with direct filesystem access to the Jenkins controller can read them from the XML configuration files.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of the Jigomerge plugin if available, otherwise remove stored passwords from job configurations and audit all jobs that used the plugin for exposed credentials.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JigomergeApplication
Affected:<= 0.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Jigomerge plugin installation and version
    Navigate to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab and search for 'jigomerge', or inspect the plugin directory at $JENKINS_HOME/plugins/ for the jigomerge folder and its manifest
    Affected if The Jigomerge plugin is installed and its version is 0.9 or earlier
  2. Identify jobs configured to use Jigomerge
    Search job config.xml files for jigomerge-related configuration elements. This can be done via filesystem search: grep -r 'jigomerge' $JENKINS_HOME/jobs/*/config.xml
    Affected if Any job configurations contain jigomerge settings, indicating the plugin was used and passwords may have been stored
  3. Examine job config.xml for plaintext passwords
    Review the contents of job config.xml files in $JENKINS_HOME/jobs/<jobname>/config.xml. Look for password fields that appear as readable text rather than masked or encrypted values
    Affected if Password fields in the configuration are stored in plaintext (unmasked, unencrypted text) rather than in Jenkins' credential password field format

A user is affected if the Jigomerge plugin version 0.9 or earlier is installed AND any jobs have been configured with jigomerge settings that contain plaintext passwords in the job config.xml files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.9
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of the Jigomerge plugin if available, otherwise remove stored passwords from job configurations and audit all jobs that used the plugin for exposed credentials.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Jigomerge plugin version greater than 0.9 (check Jenkins plugin repository for latest available version)

  1. 1. Navigate to the Jenkins dashboard
  2. 2. Go to Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins
  3. 3. Click on the 'Installed' tab
  4. 4. Locate the Jigomerge plugin in the list
  5. 5. If an update is available, click 'Update' to install the latest version
  6. 6. Restart Jenkins to apply the changes
  7. 7. After updating, verify that credentials are now stored encrypted in job config.xml files

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jigomerge Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-34806 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-34806 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data