CVE-2022-35115
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIceWarp WebClient DC2 - Update 2 Build 9 (13.0.2.9) was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the search parameter at /webmail/server/webmail.php.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in IceWarp WebClient version 13.0.2.9 (Build 9) in the search parameter at /webmail/server/webmail.php. The unsanitized search parameter allows attackers to inject malicious SQL queries, potentially enabling unauthorized data access, modification, or complete database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 13.0.2.9CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed IceWarp WebClient versionLocate the version file or check the webmail.php header for the build version, typically found in the /webmail/server/ directory or accessed via the web interface login pageAffected if The installed version is IceWarp WebClient 13.0.2.9 (Build 9)
-
Verify webmail.php endpoint existsCheck for the presence of the file /webmail/server/webmail.php in the web root directoryAffected if The file webmail.php exists and is accessible via the web server
-
Confirm search parameter is availableMake a GET or POST request to /webmail/server/webmail.php and verify the search parameter is acceptedAffected if The search parameter is accepted by the endpoint without additional authentication or sanitization checks
-
Inspect web server access logsReview web server logs (Apache, IIS, or nginx) for requests to /webmail/server/webmail.php with unusual patterns in the search parameterAffected if Log entries show unescaped SQL characters or abnormal query patterns in the search parameter
You are affected if IceWarp WebClient version 13.0.2.9 is installed and the /webmail/server/webmail.php endpoint with the search parameter is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to the latest IceWarp WebClient version with security patches applied. As an immediate workaround, implement input validation and use parameterized queries for all database interactions.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-35115 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-35115 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data