CVE-2022-3602
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisThe program writes past the bounds of a buffer, overwriting adjacent memory an attacker can turn to their advantage. Crafted input can overwrite control data and redirect execution. Remediation is validating every index and length before a write, plus modern memory-safety mitigations.
General guidance for the out-of-bounds write class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.0.0, < 3.0.7= 36= 37= 26= 27>= 18.0.0, < 18.11.0= 18.12.0= 19.0.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.0.718.11.0
OpenSSL 3.0.7+; Node.js 18.12.1+/19.1.0+; Fedora updated packages via dnf
- Identify which product uses the affected OpenSSL version (OpenSSL 3.0.0-3.0.6, Node.js 18.0.0-18.11.0/18.12.0/19.0.0, or Fedora 26/27/36/37)
- For OpenSSL: Upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.7 or later from the official OpenSSL repository or your operating system vendor
- For Node.js: Upgrade to Node.js 18.12.1, 18.13.0 or later, or Node.js 19.1.0 or later to receive the OpenSSL fix bundled with Node.js
- For Fedora: Run 'dnf update openssl' or 'dnf update' to apply security patches
- For Clustered Data ONTAP: Contact NetApp support for the specific patch, as all versions are affected
- After upgrading, restart any services that use OpenSSL (web servers, TLS-enabled applications) to load the fixed version
- Verify the fix by checking OpenSSL version (openssl version) or Node.js version (node -v)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-3602 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- packetstormsecurity.com
- www.openssl.org
- packetstormsecurity.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- git.openssl.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- lists.fedoraproject.org
- psirt.global.sonicwall.com
- security.gentoo.org
- security.netapp.com
- tools.cisco.com
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.intel.com
- cert-portal.siemens.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-3602 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data