CVE-2022-36059
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedmatrix-js-sdk is a Matrix messaging protocol Client-Server SDK for JavaScript. In versions prior to 19.4.0 events sent with special strings in key places can temporarily disrupt or impede the matrix-js-sdk from functioning properly, potentially impacting the consumer's ability to process data safely. Note that the matrix-js-sdk can appear to be operating normally but be excluding or corrupting runtime data presented to the consumer. This issue has been fixed in matrix-js-sdk 19.4.0 and users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade may mitigate this issue by redacting applicable events, waiting for the sync processor to store data, and restarting the client. Alternatively, redacting the applicable events and clearing all storage will often fix most perceived issues. In some cases, no workarounds are possible.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidencematrix-js-sdk versions prior to 19.4.0 have a vulnerability where events containing special strings in key places can disrupt SDK functionality, causing the SDK to exclude or corrupt runtime data presented to the consumer while appearing to operate normally.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 19.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify matrix-js-sdk version in useRun 'npm list matrix-js-sdk' in your project directory, or check your package.json dependencies for the matrix-js-sdk entry, or inspect node_modules/matrix-js-sdk/package.json for the 'version' fieldAffected if The version listed is below 19.4.0 (e.g., 19.3.0, 19.0.0, 18.x.x, etc.)
-
Confirm SDK is processing Matrix eventsCheck if your application uses the SDK to connect to a Matrix homeserver and receive sync responses via client.sync() or similar methodsAffected if Your application actively connects to Matrix servers and processes incoming events from other users
-
Verify runtime behavior matches expected symptomsMonitor your application for unexpected data omissions or corruption in chat content, member lists, or room state that is not visible to users but affects internal SDK stateAffected if Users report missing messages, incorrect room membership, or state inconsistencies that appear normal on the surface but indicate internal SDK data corruption
You are affected if your installed matrix-js-sdk version is lower than 19.4.0 AND your application processes events from Matrix servers, as the vulnerability allows maliciously crafted events to corrupt SDK data silently.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped19.4.0
Upgrade to matrix-js-sdk version 19.4.0 or later. Users unable to upgrade may attempt workaround by redacting problematic events, waiting for sync storage, and restarting the client, though workarounds may not always resolve the issue.
matrix-js-sdk 19.4.0
- Check the current version of matrix-js-sdk in your project by running `npm list matrix-js-sdk` or checking your package.json
- Update matrix-js-sdk to version 19.4.0 or later using your package manager (e.g., `npm install [email protected]` or `yarn upgrade [email protected]`)
- After upgrading, run your project's build process and tests to verify the upgrade does not break functionality
- If you cannot upgrade immediately, as a mitigation you can: redact the problematic events from your data store, wait for the sync processor to complete storing data, then restart the client; alternatively redact the events and clear all storage before restarting
- Re-deploy your application with the updated SDK to end users
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36059 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36059 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data