Wi Fi Network Adaptor Wap 001 FirmwareOperating system · Nintendo

CVE-2022-36293

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-08-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Buffer overflow vulnerability in Nintendo Wi-Fi Network Adaptor WAP-001 All versions allows an attacker with an administrative privilege to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Nintendo WAP-001 Wi-Fi Network Adaptor across all firmware versions. An authenticated attacker with administrative privileges can exploit this flaw to execute arbitrary code on the affected device, potentially gaining full control of the network hardware.

MitigationSince the attack requires administrative access, ensure admin interfaces are not exposed to untrusted networks. If the device is end-of-life and no firmware update is available, replace with a supported network device and isolate the legacy device behind a firewall.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Wi Fi Network Adaptor Wap 001 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the network adaptor model
    Physically inspect the device or check network inventory for a Nintendo WAP-001 Wi-Fi Network Adaptor. This is a legacy Nintendo branded wireless access point device.
    Affected if The device model is Nintendo WAP-001 Wi-Fi Network Adaptor.
  2. Confirm firmware version is not patched
    Access the device admin interface and check the firmware version in the system settings or status page. Compare against any available firmware updates from Nintendo.
    Affected if The device is a WAP-001 and is running any firmware version, as all versions are affected.
  3. Assess admin interface network exposure
    Determine if the device administrative web interface or management protocol is accessible from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules, NAT configurations, and VLAN segmentation.
    Affected if The admin interface is reachable from networks outside the trusted local network.
  4. Verify admin credentials are not default
    Check whether the device still uses default administrative credentials or if strong, unique credentials have been configured.
    Affected if The device uses default credentials or weak passwords that could be compromised.

A user is affected if they have a Nintendo WAP-001 device on their network with an accessible admin interface, regardless of firmware version since all versions are vulnerable.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since the attack requires administrative access, ensure admin interfaces are not exposed to untrusted networks. If the device is end-of-life and no firmware update is available, replace with a supported network device and isolate the legacy device behind a firewall.

Fix this in Wi Fi Network Adaptor Wap 001 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,970
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36293 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36293 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data