FirefoxWeb browser · Mozilla
CVE-2022-36320
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMozilla developers and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 102. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 103.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory safety bugs in Firefox 102 that could allow memory corruption and potentially arbitrary code execution. The vulnerability stems from unspecified memory safety issues that Mozilla developers and the Fuzzing Team identified in the Firefox 102 browser.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
FirefoxWeb browser
< 103.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Firefox is installedCheck for Firefox installation by looking in common locations: Windows (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe), macOS (/Applications/Firefox.app), or Linux (which firefox)Affected if Firefox is present on the system
-
Determine installed Firefox versionOpen Firefox, go to Menu > Help > About Firefox, or navigate to about:support in the address bar, or run 'firefox --version' from command lineAffected if Version displayed is below 103.0 (for example, 102.x, 102.0.x, or any version < 103.0)
-
Confirm all Firefox installationsCheck all user profiles and system-wide installations - on Windows check both Program Files and Program Files (x86), on macOS check /Applications and user ~/Applications folders, on Linux check /usr/bin and /optAffected if Any installed Firefox instance is version < 103.0
If any Firefox installation on the system shows a version lower than 103.0, the environment is affected by this memory corruption vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped103.0
Update Firefox to version 103 or later to patch the memory safety vulnerabilities. Organizations should deploy the browser update across all affected systems.
Firefox 103.0
- Check current Firefox version by navigating to Help > About Firefox
- Download and install Firefox 103.0 or later from the official Mozilla website (www.mozilla.org) or use the built-in update mechanism
- Restart Firefox after the update completes
- Verify the version by checking Help > About Firefox shows version 103.0 or higher
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Firefox
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36320 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36320 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data