CVE-2022-36537
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZK Framework v9.6.1, 9.6.0.1, 9.5.1.3, 9.0.1.2 and 8.6.4.1 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a crafted POST request sent to the component AuUploader.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe vulnerability exists in the AuUploader component of ZK Framework versions 9.6.1, 9.6.0.1, 9.5.1.3, 9.0.1.2 and 8.6.4.1. An unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted POST request to the AuUploader component to access sensitive information, likely due to insufficient authorization checks or improper path handling in the upload functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.6.4.2>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.1.3>= 9.5.0, < 9.5.1.3>= 9.6.0, < 9.6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify ZK Framework installation and versionLocate the ZK library JAR file (zk.jar, zkbind.jar, or similar) in your application's classpath or WEB-INF/lib directory, then check the file metadata or MANIFEST.MF for the version numberAffected if The installed version is < 8.6.4.2, or >= 9.0.0 and < 9.0.1.3, or >= 9.5.0 and < 9.5.1.3, or >= 9.6.0 and < 9.6.2
-
Verify AuUploader component is in useSearch application source code for references to AuUploader, uploader, or the zul component notation for uploader elements (e.g., <uploader> or any custom uploader implementations using ZK's upload functionality)Affected if The AuUploader component or any ZK upload mechanism is present and deployed in the application
-
Confirm exposed upload endpointsReview web.xml and application server configuration for servlet mappings related to ZK's AU (Asynchronous Update) requests. Check for URLs matching patterns like /zkau/* or /auUploader/* that accept POST requests without authenticationAffected if ZK's AU servlet endpoint is publicly accessible without authentication or additional access controls
-
Test for unauthenticated access to upload functionalitySend a crafted POST request to the ZK AU endpoint (typically /zkau/au) with upload-related command parameters, observing whether the server processes the request without requiring authentication credentialsAffected if The server accepts and processes unauthenticated POST requests to the AuUploader endpoint
A system is affected if it runs a ZK Framework version within the affected ranges AND has the AuUploader component deployed with the AU endpoint accessible without authentication
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.6.4.29.0.1.39.5.1.3
Update ZK Framework to a patched version if available. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict access to the AuUploader endpoint via authentication, network controls, or web application firewall rules to prevent unauthorized access.
Upgrade to ZK Framework 8.6.4.2 (8.x) or 9.0.1.3 (9.0.x) or 9.5.1.3 (9.5.x) or 9.6.2 (9.6.x) - choose the appropriate version based on your current major branch
- Identify the current ZK Framework version in use by checking project dependencies (pom.xml, build.gradle, or library files)
- Determine which major version branch (8.x, 9.0.x, 9.5.x, or 9.6.x) is currently in use
- For ZK 8.x users: Upgrade to version 8.6.4.2 or later
- For ZK 9.0.x users: Upgrade to version 9.0.1.3 or later
- For ZK 9.5.x users: Upgrade to version 9.5.1.3 or later
- For ZK 9.6.x users: Upgrade to version 9.6.2 or later
- Update the dependency in build configuration (Maven pom.xml or Gradle build.gradle)
- Rebuild and redeploy the application
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36537 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data