CVE-2022-36778
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedinsert HTML / js code inside input how to get to the vulnerable input : Workers > worker nickname > inject in this input the code.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the worker nickname input field within the Workers section of the application. An authenticated user can inject malicious HTML or JavaScript code into the nickname field, which will execute in the browsers of other users who view the worker profile.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Synel Eharmony installationLocate the Synel Eharmony application in your environment. Check for the application binary, installation directory, or running service. Common paths include C:\Program Files\Synel\ or /opt/synel/ on Linux systems.Affected if Synel Eharmony software is present in the environment
-
Determine installed versionCheck the application version by opening the application and navigating to Help > About, or by examining version.info, version.txt, or the installer log files in the installation directory.Affected if The installed version number is below 11 (e.g., 10.x, 9.x, etc.)
-
Access Workers sectionLog into the Synel Eharmony application with valid credentials and navigate to the Workers or Employee Management section of the interface.Affected if You can successfully access the Workers section and view worker profiles
-
Locate nickname input fieldOpen any worker profile within the Workers section and locate the Nickname or Display Name input field. Verify this field accepts user-supplied text.Affected if The worker profile contains an editable nickname field that accepts free-form text input
If Synel Eharmony version 11 or lower is installed and the Workers section with an editable nickname field is accessible, the environment is affected by this XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data11
Implement proper input validation and output encoding/sanitization for the worker nickname field. Use a whitelist approach for allowed characters and ensure all user-supplied data is properly escaped before being rendered in HTML contexts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-36778 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-36778 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data